Monthly Archives: June 2011
(ver 1.4) This is Part 1 in a series of basic Bible lessons on the subject of Being Led by the Spirit of God. I have taught one introductory lesson to this series that you might want to start with and it is called “Recognizing the Voice of God“. There are many Christians in the world who do not understand spiritual things in the degree that is necessary to allow God to direct them into truth, peace, safety, prosperity and health. Of course because they do not understand how God speaks, they assume God is in control of everything that happens in their life. So when positive things do not happen to them, they often conclude that it must be the will of God for them to be experiencing these negatives. Or some think that it is just God’s way of teaching them, testing them or correcting them. There are more erroneous doctrines in some churches than there are Bible based doctrines. Jesus looked at the Pharisees and said “Your traditions have made the Word of God ineffectual and worthless”. That was my paraphrase of a verse in the N.T. that actually says:
Mar 7:13 Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
We can look up the Greek Word definition for the word translated as “none effect” and see that it means to invalidate. It was a common practice of religious people in Jesus’ day to take the Word of God and to add to it or to replace it with their own rules and manmade doctrines. Whenever you do this according to Jesus you invalidate God’s word. Do you understand how foolish that is? Yet people still do it today in almost every church denomination. Teaching things that are not found in the Bible gives people the wrong impression that what is happening to them right now is the will of God for them. They can pray about it and ask God to do something, but if it does not change things that they are facing, they simply think that it is up to them to stay humble and to accept it. After all you just never know what God has in mind? The ways of God are just so far above ours that we cannot comprehend them. That is what many churches teach. That is also a very poor reality to endure when it is not what God said in the Bible at all. I believe God says His Church will go out victorious and not defeated. So you have to decide very fast, what does “victory” mean to you? Does it mean poverty, sickness, depression, despair and sadness? I believe these are the signs of being defeated and not of victory. I never saw a victorious sports team fall down in agony and despair. They are always jubilant and shouting with great happiness. Yes, we will all have none of these negative things when we get to heaven, but who says we are to endure them now in the mean time? These are the doctrines of men that are taught in many churches that ignore God and the Bible. I call it a “Mother Theresa” Christian philosophy. I do not mean to criticize Mother Theresa, but people who look up to her as an example for Christianity; I have a major problem with them. Sure it looks good to many on the surface, a woman going around the world feeding the poor and the hungry and she does not own even a good pair of shoes herself. That is an extreme religious concept not found in the Bible, to do without so that others can have. If everyone would suddenly become Christians, we would all be homeless and shoeless people. She gives away all of the good shoes to others and takes only what others do not want. That is just not what Jesus did and Jesus was our example and not mother Theresa. I like what Jesus says to us:
Joh 13:15 For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you.
Jesus said to us that He has set before us an example to follow. Therefore we need to learn what Jesus did and did not do in order to learn what this example is that we are supposed to be following. People have tried to say that Jesus owned nothing and that He gave away everything and these are two erroneous doctrines of men that promote the poverty Mother Theresa mentality. Do you recall that Jesus had a man of His 12 disciples that carried the money purse? Judas was the treasurer and there was so much money in the bag that he could take some of it out and people would not notice it was missing. Then when Jesus was crucified, His robe that He was wearing was so valuable that the soldiers gambled over who would possess it. They refused to rip it up into pieces because it was a seamless fabric construction. These were the types of robes that were worn only by wealthy men and the rulers of the country. That is why they wanted it as a complete garment piece. Neither of these two stories fit the Mother Theresa philosophy of poverty. When Jesus saw that the crowd was hungry in the Gospels, what did Jesus do? Did Jesus give away all of His food to feed them? No that is not what Jesus did. Jesus sought for what the crowd had to give him to bless and then He multiplied that to feed everyone. Someone in the crowd had to give first or no one would have eaten. These are just some of the examples that Jesus gave us to follow. When was the last time you saw a Mother Theresa do any of these? If you say never, then she was NOT following Jesus’ examples.
What God do you serve? Are you serving the God of the Bible or the God of someone’s religion? I’m sorry if I’m offending anyone today that is not my intention. Today’s subject is being led by the Spirit of God and we need to learn how to do this if we are to understand that a Mother Theresa type of God is not the God of the Bible or the Jesus of the Bible. Let me give you another example of what Jesus said:
Mat 11:5 The blind receive their sight, and the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, and the poor have the gospel preached to them.
Here is Jesus speaking to the people of Israel and proclaiming He is anointed to change their current circumstances and situations around. Jesus specifically names three diseases as being cured. Then Jesus says the dead are raised up to life and finally He ends the verse with the poor have the Gospel proclaimed to them. What is this Gospel? The Greek Word translated as “gospel” literally means “Good News”. What is good news to a poor man? This is really not that complicated, but people twist the word of God to say things that it does not say. First, look back at the context of what is said about the sicknesses and the diseases. Isn’t every diseased situation turned around 180 degrees to the opposite of what they had. The blind now see! The filthy lepers are now clean! The deaf can now hear. The dead are made to live. But, all of sudden we want to say the poor are not made rich. I will tell you very plainly that if every other situation is turned completely around, that means it applies to every situation named. If you do not do this you are being selective in your interpretation of the Bible. I believe that according to this verse God says that “you should not be living in poverty”. Uh oh? I’m sure I’m going to hear about that from somebody who disagrees with me. Maybe after you learn how to be led by the Spirit of God, you will see that He will lead you from where you are now to where you should be. I am also not preaching that you will become a millionaire or a billionaire. That is not what I am saying, I am just saying there is a great deal of room for improvement and God will help you turn around to get there if you learn to listen to Him. So much for my introduction, let’s get into being led by the Spirit of God:
Rom 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.
Here is my foundational scripture for this entire series of lessons. This verse is a conditional verse. In other words it is valid for only those who qualify for it. It clearly tells me that not everyone is a son of God; only those that have chosen to be led by God are His children. To be led by the Spirit of God, means many things to many people and few people actually understand the concept of being led. First let me say if you can be led, you can also choose not to be led. Uh oh? We have a major problem developing for people who teach predestination and fatalism. People who teach these erroneous doctrines obviously ignore or explain away verses like these in the Bible that are clearly conditional statements which convey human responsibility and accountability as being the determining factors to if they qualify to be called a son of God.
The concept of God leading His people brings to mind many other subjects that are related. The concept of a shepherd leading his sheep comes to my mind immediately. We should know that in the book of John the tenth chapter that Jesus calls himself the “Good Shepherd” or the “Shepherd” approximately four times. You need to read this chapter in its entirety if you have not done so recently. The shepherd concept is the concept of how God leads His people with His Spirit. A shepherd will always lead the sheep by going before them with his staff and calling to his sheep to follow him to the green pastures or to the still waters (Ps 23). This is a directly related subject to how the Holy Spirit will speak to you to ask you to follow Him. In order to know that God leads, you must first recognize the fact that God speaks and then that He speaks to you. Wow, that is a tough concept for many Christians. There are literally hundreds of times recorded in the Bible that God is said to speak directly to a man. You can see God speaking to Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Elijah and on and on I could go. I guess people are struggling to think that God still speaks today and that God will more specifically speak to them. I am here to tell you today that if you are a born again Christian, God will speak to you in order to fulfill His word. God promises to lead His people and He does this with His voice. But, do not jump to the wrong conclusions that this was or is with an audible voice. We will get to that later in this series.
Joh 10:4 And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice.
Here is a basic confirmation for what I just taught you. This verse tells you exactly how God will lead you. God will go before you and guide you into the path that you need to go by speaking directly to you. If you are His sheep, then Jesus says you will know His voice and be able to recognize it. So if you have never heard from God, I would check to make sure that you are one of His sheep first. How do you know you are one of His sheep? There is a specific requirement in the Bible and that is for you to follow. I have a webpage dedicated to knowing you are His so if you do not know for sure you can know for sure today by reading and following the instructions given. Then determine if you are listening to hear His voice. When you learn to recognize His voice you can begin to follow Him because you will associate God’s character and His ways to His voice. People will only follow Him if they want to follow Him. This is the major problem with why many Christians are not being led; they do not understand the character or ways of God. If God was not good, or was not loving, or was not feeding them and protecting them, then why would anyone want to follow Him? Many churches teach about a God of judgment and condemnation and thus people are reluctant to be led by someone who is out to cause them to have cancer or cause them to be poor or cause them to do without even the basics of life. Maybe I should have taught on the character of God first, but hopefully for most of my readers they already understand the goodness of God.
Today’s lesson is just the introduction to the subject of God still leads and how God leads His people. God leads by a Sheepfold principle of Shepherd management. God will speak and show the way, but God will never force you to follow. Wow, that is so important I want to say it again. You have a choice to make to whether you follow or do not follow Him and His voice. That further means that you have the choice to either hear, or not to hear His voice. That also means you have the responsibility to understand that He will lead you, then to learn to recognize your shepherd’s voice, to know His character, His ways, His intentions and His love for His sheep. It is only then that you will be trusting and willing to go blindly walking behind Him to where He wants to take you. Faith and trust are two key factors to being led by the Spirit of God. God may not tell you where you are going, He may just say follow me. If you trust Him you will listen, obey and follow. If you do not trust Him then you have a greater problem of not knowing Him.
Here is my Top 10 list of things to learn from the basics of today’s lesson:
- The Spirit of God always leads His people.
- God uses a Shepherd Guidance principle to lead His people.
- God will go before His people and show them the way calling them by name.
- People are responsible to listen for their Shepherd’s voice. In other words you do not know exactly what will be said or when it will be told to you until you hear the directions.
- People are responsible to know and to recognize His voice.
- People are required not to follow the other voices that do not come from the Shepherd.
- People are responsible to obey and to follow His voice.
- People will only follow a Shepherd when they trust that He will not hurt them.
- Thus we as Christians walk by faith and not by sight based upon our trust in His Word.
- God may not tell you where you are going so you must follow Him by using your faith and trust in only Him.
As you can see from my list, God places the majority of the responsibility of what people do to be led by the Spirit upon us, the sheep. You can always count on God’s faithfulness and His goodness to lead you, but after that it is all up to you if you choose to follow Him. God will not tie a rope around your neck and drag you behind Him. That is a manmade doctrine of predestination. Once saved always saved is another concept that does not fit with this shepherd and sheep analogy taught by Jesus. The responsibility of following the Shepherd is always placed on the sheep and not the Shepherd. God is not going to use sheep dog angels to keep anyone from straying away from the flock. Any sheep can walk away from the flock and follow the voice of any stranger at any time. Any sheep can be deceived and devoured by the wolves while they are not within the safety of the protecting Shepherd. These are God’s words and not mine, if you do not understand them you can pretend to stay in your man made doctrines and hope that you have not already been deceived into following a wolf in sheep’s clothing. I would suggest that you learn to listen for the voice of the “Good Shepherd” and begin to follow Him instead of your manmade doctrines.
I’ll end this lesson with a warning. You do not seek for voices to lead you. That is not what I am saying. There are many spiritual voices in the world that can lead you down many different wrong paths that end in destruction. Your number one goal is to get to know your Shepherd by reading in His word to find His character. When you see the moral fiber of God is goodness and love you begin to see that His ways are different than Satan’s ways. Jesus said that “Satan has come to kill, steal and to destroy you”, but then Jesus your shepherd said “I am come that you might have life and that life more abundantly”. One voice is death and the other is life. This is what God said in Deuteronomy “I have set before your life and death, blessing ad cursing, therefore choose life that you and your seed may live”. You are therefore not seeking for a voice, you are seeking for the giver of Life and He will speak to you. There is a major difference in what you seek and who you seek. If you seek first the Kingdom of heaven, Jesus said all these other things would be added to you. So you are only seeking to know the Good Shepherd, His love, His Mercy, His Compassion, His Grace and His Power. When you seek Him then He will speak to you and you will learn His voice. Spend time in the Bible and study to learn His Marvelous Ways. Spend time in prayer to know Him personally, then Be Still and know that He is God to listen for Him to speak. Until next time, God Bless You!
If you would like to continue reading in this series, you may go to “Part 2“.
Understanding the Hidden Spiritual Family Structure of God’s Household! The Mature Women in God’s Spiritual Family! Part 7
(Ver 1.2) This is now Part 7 in a series of extremely advanced Bible studies about a new subject that I call “The Hidden Spiritual Structure of the Family of God”. The spiritual information in this series will dramatically change your perspective of the Bible, if you can see them and if you will choose to accept them. I have covered a tremendous amount of new ideas and revelations and I cannot take the time to go back and repeat all of them today, so if you have not read this series from the beginning I would suggest that you go back and start reading with “Part 1” first. In the last lesson I introduced you to the last woman in the family of God as the church. She is the youngest woman called the daughter in a new covenant marriage with the risen Son of God, Jesus Christ. This woman was named the New Jerusalem in Revelation 3:12 and 21:2 and she is called the Holy Jerusalem in Revelation 21:10. Three times in Revelation she has the title of the “daughter-in-law” or the synonymous interpretation the “bride” (G3565) found in Revelation 21:2, 21:9 and 22:17 and this can be seen easily by looking at the original Greek word definition. Today I want to search the Bible for the identities of the other two mature women in the family of 5. As you recall, God said the “daughter” would be divided against her mother and the “daughter-in-law” would be divided against her mother-in-law in Micah 7:6, Matthew 10:35 and Luke 12:53. So we are now looking in the Bible for the information and the specific names to reveal who these two women are that are divided from our church daughter. I found the identity of the “daughter-in-law” simply by searching the Bible for the same Greek word (G3565) translated as “daughter-in-law” and I found her identity easily revealed in the books of John and Revelation because of the limited usage of this word in the N.T. She was described to be a city, a bride and the spiritual wife of the Lamb of God. This woman was also described to be a spiritual nation of people that consisted of both male and female individuals that reside now as a part of God’s new spiritual family. Therefore we are now searching for the other women with a similar pattern, make-up, characteristics or features. We are also searching for not just two women, but more specifically two mothers and that should narrow the scope of the search significantly. The Hebrew word used for “mother” in Micah 7:6 is H517 and there are over 200 verses in the Bible that contain this word. That is really too many verses to be useful. The Hebrew word translated as “mother in law” is H2545 and this word is only found in one other book of the Bible and that makes it very interesting to me. It just so happens that the “mother-in-law” H2545 is used 9 other times in the book of Ruth and only one time in Micah 7:6. I do not believe that this is a coincidence. I see it to be a direct hidden clue to the identity of at least one of the women in God’s family.
Do you recall the story of Ruth? If you do not, I have a more in-depth lesson series on this book of the Bible that will explore and explain many of the hidden typologies found there. I will for your benefit give you a quick synopsis of that lesson series to show you how it applies to Jesus the Son, the church the daughter and the mother-in-law of the church. Ruth was a Gentile woman who married a Hebrew husband after this Jewish family moved to her country of Moab from Bethlehem. Her husband and the other males in the family all died in Moab and that left two daughter-in-laws and their mother in law as the surviving widows. One daughter-in-law returns to her family, but the other one departs with her mother-in-law to go back to Bethlehem. This gentile “daughter-in-law” was named Ruth. She is the primary subject of the entire book. There in Bethlehem, while trying to survive Ruth is met by a man named Boaz. It just so happens, that Ruth is laboring in a harvest field that is owned by Boaz. Boaz is a near relative to Ruth’s mother-in-law’s dead husband. This means Boaz is a potential kinsman “Redeemer”. Ruth is given favor from Boaz and is blessed while she is working his harvest field. To make a long story shorter, Boaz marries the woman Ruth and redeems the land of the dead relative and they become the great grandparents of David the King. This natural story of Ruth is an amazing parallel to another New Testament spiritual story. Today’s church is largely comprised of Gentile people, so the church qualifies to be the symbolic type of this woman Ruth and both are called “daughter-in-laws”. We are now the laborers in God’s harvest field of the earth and He owns the field that we are working in right now. God has granted us His favor and blessings while we are working in His harvest field. We are of course not harvesting natural food, but we are harvesting symbolic wheat for God’s harvest and that is His people. Boaz the kinsman Redeemer was a Jew from Bethlehem and he is a type of the man Jesus Christ also a Jew born in Bethlehem. Of course Jesus Christ was God in the flesh that came down from heaven to the earth which is a type of the land of spiritual Moab. Jesus Christ was crucified and died in this realm of spiritual Moab on a cross and then He was raised from the dead to redeem us from our sins and to save us from this world. That makes Ruth’s mother-in-law a symbolic type of the nation of Israel. You will see why I say that very soon. In this story of Ruth we have a “daughter-in-law” who becomes a “bride”. We have a mother-in-law that is a Jew under the Law from Bethlehem. We also have a son from Bethlehem who becomes the husband (bridegroom) to redeem his bride. There are many other Bible patterns in this book, but I only hit the ones that we needed for this lesson. The story of Ruth is a story of natural Israel, God the Father, the Son of God and the church and each of these are demonstrated to us in amazing clarity in the book of Ruth using the keywords of the mother-in-law and the daughter in-law to direct us to this information. These are the two exact words from Micah 7:6 so they must contain related information that we need to know about. What we need is an additional witness to this hidden reality in another book of the Bible and that is where we are going soon.
John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
Joh 3:6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
Jesus taught us something that was very profound in the third chapter of John. When Jesus described the “new birth” He said “That which is born of the flesh is only flesh, but that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Jesus reveals a significant spiritual law here in this statement. First, Jesus says spirits can give birth to spirits and second, only a spirit can produce other spirits. Jesus goes on to say in this chapter of John, “Unless a man is born again, he cannot see the Kingdom of God”. This verse stipulates a fixed requirement that a second birth must take place or you will never see God’s eternal kingdom. This statement of Jesus of course blew the mind of Nicodemus and this natural thinking man asked “How can a man be born again?” “Can he enter again into his mother’s womb?” Of course this was not what Jesus was saying at all. Neither was Jesus thinking naturally of another physical birth. Jesus is not teaching physical reincarnation. Here is a prime example of how people can hear what God is saying and totally miss it because they are not on the same level as the speaker. This is the greatest challenge new Christians have in the world today. To renew people’s minds to think spiritually instead of naturally is the biggest challenge that I am faced with while teaching on the internet. Most of my critics are dominated by naturally thinking carnal minds. They do not attempt to think outside of their little carnal box and thus they remain ignorant of what God wants them to know. Romans 8:7, says the carnal mind is an enemy against God. So when my critics tell me I’m wrong, they are speaking as an enemy of God. I certainly feel sorry for them, but I have learned that I cannot help them. Let’s see what Jesus was actually speaking of:
Joh 3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
Jesus is comparing two different types of birth in this one verse; one is a natural birth and the other is spiritual birth. Jesus is saying that you are born naturally when your mother’s water breaks and you enter into the natural world through her physical door and then you are born spiritually by a similar patterned act from the Spirit of God. Do you remember that Jesus said “I am the door” (Jo 10:9)? Jesus is saying there is a spiritual door into the Kingdom of God and you will not enter into it unless you find it first. Wow, that is pretty radical for those who think there are many ways to God. Why is Jesus revealing that spiritual things are repeated patterns of the natural things that God created? You better get a hold of this concept very fast if you ever want to learn about what God is trying to teach you.
There is a spiritual law of Genesis about seeds that is very relevant to my lesson today. This law was a foundational principle found within the patterns of creation in Genesis. One of the key seed law principles states that everything that God created produces after its own kind (Genesis 1:11, 12, 21, 24, 25). Flesh produces only flesh. Cows produce only cows. Dogs produce only dogs. But, also Jesus teaches us in John 3 that a Spirit produces only spirits. It is very clear that spirits can give birth based upon the information revealed in John 3 and the natural patterns found in creation. For example, the sperm of a man is called his seed in the O.T (Lev 15:16). But the Word of God is also implied to be God’s spiritual sperm in 1 Peter 1:23. Both are “seeds” but one is natural and the other is spiritual. These are patterns that are being repeated for us to apply the concepts found in the natural to understand the concepts of the unseen spiritual dimension. Those are radical concepts from the Creator. What I am attempting to do is to give you verification from the scriptures that a spirit can give birth to a spirit. Therefore, if the church is a spiritual daughter and not a physical one, we are looking for another spiritual woman that is able to give birth to us. That statement will probably perplex many Christians who are not yet familiar with the Bible in this level of detail, but that is just the way it goes.
So far I have been giving you some basic facts of life concepts found both in creation and the Bible. These are important patterned concepts that you need to give your attention to today, because they are very relevant to understanding God and the Bible. God has replicated patterns from the spiritual realm into the created natural realm and these patterns will be further projected back into the new heaven and the new earth that are coming soon. I personally believe that God created all natural things from precise patterns found within spiritual things that previously existed in the divine realm. God then uses these temporary natural things to teach us about the spiritual concepts of eternal things to come. It is a circular configuration of a divine design with transferred patterns from the spiritual to the temporal and then finally back to the spiritual. It is the cycle of life as found within a progressively designed divine plan. Things that were found originally in the beginning are the things that shall be found again in the end. In the beginning of Genesis we see that God created everything good with the absence of all evil. This is exactly how it will end after chapter 20 of Revelation and after Satan, the beast and the false prophet are cast into their eternal torment. What God has created in the world is almost always an identifiable pattern for something in the spiritual realm that we have never seen.
Take the human body for example. The human body is comprised of millions and even billions of individual cells, systems, subsystems and individual parts that are working all together to form one body. Does any of that sound familiar? We have more than one thing that comprises or makes up to form one unified body working in harmony. The natural pattern of the human body’s design is the same concept that God reiterates when He describes us (the entire church) to be the spiritual body of Christ (1 Cor 12:13-27). The spiritual church is comprised of millions or even billions of people and yet we are still just one spiritually unified body. The concept of one being made up of many is a repeatable occurrence in the Bible that is foundational to understanding all of the identities of the women in the family of God. None of the women in the spiritual family of God are just one person or one female individual. Each spiritual woman is comprised of millions or even billions of people or spiritual beings that are joined together to become one spiritually named woman in covenant with God. This was one of my main subjects from the last lesson, so please try to follow along the best that you can, it will only get much deeper than this as we continue to dig into this subject.
It is now time to reveal the mature spiritual women (mothers) in the family of God. Both of these women were specifically described to be “mothers” therefore, both have children. One was the mother of the daughter (bride) and other one was the mother of the son (bridegroom). But, just as Eve is named the mother of all natural living descendants we are looking for a spiritual woman that all spiritual children can come from. I believe to solve this puzzle we will need to look for verses in the Bible that describe two mothers and hopefully in the same verse. Here is where it will start to get really interesting for some people and potentially more controversial for others. I am about to show you another O.T. prophecy about the family of God that is very important for you to understand fully, but is also very difficult to understand. This Old Testament verse reflects some more complex riddles, so be prepared for a set of new mental challenges. I want to take you to the prophet Isaiah and get you to read about two women in the family of God from a new perspective.
Isa 54:1 Sing, O barren, thou that didst not bear; break forth into inging, and cry aloud, thou that didst not travail with child: for more are the children of the desolate than the children of the married wife, saith the LORD.
If you are not reading the Bible with your spiritual eyeglasses on you are reading it blindly. God is describing something very mysterious and profound here in another obscure prophecy found in the O.T. Have you ever heard anyone teach about what this verse means? I can honestly say that I have not! However it is very difficult for anyone to teach what they do not understand. I read some commentaries and they were all over the board to what they thought it meant. This verse was written in the major prophet Isaiah’s work for God. You will find in studying the Bible that God will use a technique of hiding information that I call “dissemination”. This technique incorporates the random spreading out of related information throughout the Bible to make it infinitely more difficult for us to find it and for us to then put them all together correctly. It is like when I sow new grass seed in my yard using a broadcast spreader, I put seeds in the hopper and adjust the flow and depending on the speed that I travel the seed is thrown out in random patterns over the spots that need it and I do not know what lands where. Dissemination of the Word of God is a random broadcasting seed concept and God does this throughout the Bible. You will never know where you will find some of the most valuable keys to understanding a subject in the Bible until you search for them. Many times it will appear to be a needle in a haystack concept when looking for the truth in the Bible. It might be found in Genesis or Revelation or anywhere in between. Without the Spirit of God, computers and modern technology it would be impossible for any man to find the clues and then put all of the pieces together correctly.
However look closely at this verse in Isaiah and tell me if you can see that God is speaking about two wives, two women and two mothers? There are definitely two different females being spoken of in this verse and they are directly being compared against each other. Both women we are told are mothers of children, but we are not told who the mothers or the children are. However the Hebrew word translated as children is actually the Hebrew word “ben” that means “son”. When Jesus was here on the earth He would call Himself a “ben” of man. I understand why the translators are confused and put the word for children here, but that is not the correct translation and you will understand why soon. In order to be a mother in the Bible you had to have been married. Of course our definition of marriage in the modern world has become biased or slanted based upon the legal definition of a piece of paper or a license or a ceremony that was performed. However, God clearly tells us in 1 Corinthians 6:16 that sex between a man and a woman constitutes a marriage in His eyes. If you have sexual relations with anyone, by the definition from the Word of God you are married to them. It does not matter how many partners that you have, it can be one or thousands. If our court systems went by God’s definition there would be a lot less people doing what they are doing. No doubt many people would benefit from this knowledge of the truth today. It is interesting to note that only one wife in this verse in Isaiah is called married, but they must both be married in order to have any children. Therefore, God is teaching us something else that is deeper with this statement. I will not be able to explain this in this lesson today because this will just cloud the main subject more than it has already.
Let me tell you that God gives us a lot of hidden information in this single verse of scripture found in Isaiah. We have two women being spoken of in very anonymous terms. No names are given and no identities are revealed. One woman is called barren, but she suddenly has a change of status to have many more sons than the other woman who is specifically called married. Wow, that is pretty tough to understand and it is another monumental riddle. What is God talking about in this statement? I personally believe that God gives us some of the most important information in the Bible in the form of riddles to challenge us to solve them. The way that this verse was written, it makes it completely illogical and even unsolvable unless God gives us some additional clues to what exactly He is talking about somewhere else in the Bible. Fortunately for us, God did give us some major clues to reveal the meaning of this prophecy when He taught Paul what it meant in the New Testament and Paul recorded it for us in the book of Galatians.
Before I go to the book of Galatians, I want to make another quick point about the Hebrew word translated as “barren” in this verse. This Hebrew word is not used extensively in the Bible and that is another clue for us. If you search your Bible you will find that the wives of the three patriarchs of Israel were all described with this exact same word and status. You will find Abram’s wife Sarai called barren in Genesis 11:30. You will find Isaac’s wife Rebekah called barren in Genesis 25:21. Finally, you will find that Jacob’s wife Rachel was called barren in Genesis 29:31. These are very important examples to understand, but I just do not have the time to explain them all today. I wanted to teach you how to look for clues in the Bible. That does not mean you will understand what all of the clues mean automatically just because you find them. I will tell you that they are all definitely related to what we are talking about today and that is all I can say about them for now. However, we will look at one of them in much more detail, because God reveals it to be directly related by what Paul wrote in Galatians. I have tried to teach you that there is a law of Bible interpretation that I call the “law of first mention”. In this law I have found that God always gives us some very important information about any subject the first time it is mentioned in the Bible. The subject of being barren is no different. The first woman in the Bible described to be barren is Abraham’s wife Sarah. So let’s go to Galatians and learn what this prophecy found in Isaiah means. This verse of prophecy is repeated almost exactly in Galatians 4:27, but we will have to back up in the chapter to read the context in order to understand what is being revealed to us, so let’s start reading with verse 22:
Gal 4:22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
As you can see God is speaking directly about Abraham and who we are told had two sons. Do you see that God is speaking about two women again? Not just two random women, but specifically two mothers of two children who were called the wives of Abraham. You may recall that Sarah was Abraham’s wife first and that she was the barren wife that I showed you in Genesis 11:30. So this story of Abraham fits the pattern of the prophecy in Isaiah by the direct usage of the Hebrew word translated as “barren”. Two mothers are what we are looking for to solve our family of 5 mystery and Abraham is said to have had two wives. One is described to be a freewoman who is a representative type of his wife Sarah and the other wife was called the bondwoman, who is a woman that Sarah gave to her husband Abraham because she thought that she was unable to have children for him. This slave wife was named Hagar in this story and she can be found the first time in Genesis 16:1. Let me quickly show you a scripture concerning these two women:
Gen 16:3 And Sarai Abram’s wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife.
Sarai is directly called the wife of Abram first. Sarai is first mentioned in the Bible in Genesis 11:29 so she was around for 5 chapters before the mention of Hagar. Keep this in mind! Hagar is the maid servant slave girl from Egypt. This will also become very important that she is a slave from Egypt latter when we discover who she is a type for. But, also notice what the result was of this gift from Sarai to her husband. God informs us that Hagar has also become Abram’s wife. God is revealing something very complex that has occurred in the spiritual realm by showing us the repeated patterns that have reoccurred in the natural realm. Here we have one man with two wives and two children and this is either an amazing coincidence or it is God pointing us to a match for the 5 in one family pattern.
- Abraham Father
- Sarah Mother Freewoman Barren
- Hagar Mother Bondwoman Married
- Ishmael Son Slave
- Isaac Son Free
We have three specific parents being described to us. One male and two females with two sons, but they are still all just one family. This is really going to get very deep as we continue through these coming verses, so please read them very carefully. Also notice for now that Abraham is the father and that he has two wives and two children and that definitely equals 5 in one family and this will generally fit the pattern of the family of 5 again with only some minor differences in family titles only. While these are not exact matches for the Micah 7:6 family of 5, it is similar enough for me to see that this is not a coincidence and that God is relating to us some new information that is definitely important for us to see. Have you ever made a dress using a pattern and a sewing machine? While I have never done this, I did watch my mother do this and I learned the concepts behind the work. You can choose any material and totally change the look and the feel of the dress, by using different fabrics with the same pattern. One pattern can produce many dresses that are similar but also they can look and feel completely different to each other. This is what God is doing in these verses of the two families of 5. God is using the same pattern with some different spiritual fabrics. Not everything is going to match perfectly when you do this, but the expert will still be able to identify the usage of the repeated patterns. Do you understand this? You probably do if you are a woman, but my example is probably not too easily identifiable to many men. It is the concept that is important for now and it is not important to get distracted by too many details at this level of the study. Let us continue to the next verse in the chapter of Galatians to see what God has revealed to Paul about Abraham’s family:
Gal 4:23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
God is still speaking of two mothers and two children that came by the one father. All of this is very familiar so far! The only difference between these two children is that they are both males. So they do not get married to each other to start a new family and that changes nothing, but the creation of a new family. In this verse God further tells us that one son came by the deeds of the flesh and the other son came as a result of a promise. We could logically make the leap that one son came from the works of man in the natural realm and the other son came by spiritual faith in the promise of God, if you want to combine other information given to us by Paul found in Romans. But, for now we will see that we have a family of 5 that is again being divided, but this time they are being divided not by the marriage of the siblings, but by the command of Sarah to cast out the bond woman and her son, that we will soon see. Let me skip down quickly to verse 30 in Galatians 4 to connect you with what is being taught, so that you can see more clearly what I am talking about in combination with the pattern of division found within a family of 5.
Gal 4:30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
This verse is a quote from Genesis 21:10. You can clearly see another pattern is developing or being repeated using a different two members in a family of 5; yet still resulting in the division of the family with 3 against 2. Isn’t this what Jesus said to us in Luke 12:52? Jesus is giving you a key pattern to look for in the Bible. Here in this verse in Galatians we are seeing the pattern being used again. The bond woman and her son are cast out of the family of Abraham and that leaves 3 family members still in the family and two family members on the outside of the family. It is a subtle change and it reflects more complex information that I will not be able to elaborate on at this point today. Just take note of the reuse of the pattern of 3 divided against 2 and we will leave it at that for now. Let me give you a new picture of what we have learned so far:
Hopefully you can see the basic patterns being redeployed in this picture digaram. There is a split or a divisin within the family of five that is dividing them 3 agains 2. Let’s go to the next verse in Galatians that I was going through to see how this information fits into the family of God. What we are seeing demonstrated to us by God is a Biblical typology using natural patterns to reveal existing and prophetic spiritual truths. Remember we are learning about the two women and how they are both called mothers. Also take note that God is using a real man and his real two wives to teach us about His spiritual family. In other words Abram, Sarai and Hagar are not God’s family only the examples used to show us God’s family. God is speaking about Sarai as being the freewoman and Hagar as being the bond woman and these are revealed to be something much more significant using God’s allegorically encoded information found in Genesis 16.
Gal 4:24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
We know this information would have been impossible for us to see or to understand by just reading the natural accounts of Abraham, Sarah and Hagar in the book of Genesis. People have read the story of Abraham for thousands of years and no one had any clue that it was allegorical information about God’s family. We would not have had any hint what was going on if God had not revealed it to Paul about what the story of Abraham in Genesis symbolically represented. An allegory in the Bible is always a real historical story about real people doing real things in real places that contains a hidden spiritual symbolic meaning encoded within every adjective, noun and verb selected by God to describe them. You can clearly see that this is God’s definition and not mine based upon what is being revealed to us in this chapter of Galatians. This is a principle that reveals to us the words of God in the Bible have been carefully chosen many times to contain parallel meanings. In other words God could have said many things about Abraham that He did not say, but since these words were selected, they were specifically designed with a hidden purpose. I once had a commenter try to tell me that the Bible did not contain allegory and that this was a man made concept invented in the dark ages. This commenter obviously never read the Bible very closely, did he?
We can clearly see from this story that there is a direct connection to God based upon what is being said about these two women representing two covenants. God is saying that these two women represent two different covenants and this is a Bible code word that means two marriages between God and two different women. Therefore we know that God the Father was in covenant with two different women simultaneously as this chapter of Galatians is revealing to you. You have to understand “Bible Covenants” in order to understand what is being taught. A covenant with God is always initiated by God. God is the author of all covenants by His design. A covenant with God is also a divine marriage (Jer 31:32, Mal 2:14) between God the husband and the chosen people His wife. In other words we do not go to God and ask will you make a covenant with me, He comes to us and says will you marry me? So when God initiates a covenant with mankind or any spiritual beings, it is always a marriage proposal. If you do not understand these concepts you should go and read my lessons on “Understanding Bible Covenants”.
Since the Bible is divided into two covenants, many people automatically assume in error that God is speaking about these two obvious prominent Bible covenants that practically everyone knows. We are being presented another mysterious riddle by God. We can clearly see in Galatians 4:24 that Hagar represents the covenant given to Israel on Mt. Sinai. Which covenant was that? This covenant is what most Christians today normally call the “Old Covenant”. It is very interesting to note that God says everyone that was in that Old Covenant was called slaves. You need to remember that because it is very important. Based upon this information people automatically conclude that the only other covenant being spoken of here is the “New Covenant” given to the church by Jesus Christ. However this is impossible based upon the allegorical information given to us in Genesis and the family of 5 revealed in Micah 7:6. In this story in Genesis you need to pay very closer attention to who the women are a type of in the allegory and then see the ages of the two women and find out who was married to whom first. Since a Covenant is a marriage, was Abraham married to Sarah or to Hagar first using God’s definition of marriage? Was Sarah older than the slave girl Hagar? Did Abraham have sex with Sarah or Hagar first? Who gave Hagar to Abraham to be his wife? All of this is very important and very relevant for you to understand which covenants God is speaking of. Hagar is revealed to be the bond woman and she is a much younger woman than Sarah, so keep that in mind as we continue through the rest of these verses in Galatians. Let’s continue down chapter 4 of Galatians and look at verse 25 to see the spiritual name of God’s younger wife given to us first. Again we are looking at the “last being first” concept and this is a repeated pattern that I am following to teach you this information in reverse order:
Gal 4:25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
Hagar is called the “Jerusalem that now is” and her name is given to us from a human viewpoint or perspective. Keep this in mind as we go forward. If Hagar is a representative pattern of a woman who answers to someone calling her “Jerusalem” that clearly tells us her name and it reveals to us the key duplicate features that we are looking for to solve our mystery. This wife is a named city and she has the same name “Jerusalem” and the inhabitants of this city will consist of both men and women in covenant with God the Father (Jer 31:32).
Are you beginning to see why I said what I said about the “New Jerusalem” in the last lesson? What I said before was if there exists a New Jerusalem there must also by logic exist an Old Jerusalem using the law of opposition or opposites. Here is God telling us about a woman, a wife, a mother and He figuratively names her “the Earthly Jerusalem”. This Earthly Jerusalem is the city that is still in the Middle East today and is called the capital of the natural nation of Israel and she is described to be a type of Hagar. Remember who Hagar was? She was the young slave woman still in bondage after coming out of Egypt. Uh oh? Some Christians are going to have some major difficulty starting to develop from what God is saying to us in this information. First off everyone thinks that God freed Israel when He brought them out of Egypt and God is clearly saying here in these verses that they are evidently still slaves from Egypt. Wow, that is really tough to accept, isn’t it? Is God lying to us? Is God confused? Did God forget that he freed them from Egypt? I personally believe that it is people who are confused. You see I do not believe God freed them, I believe that God bought them out of bondage. To be purchased is totally different than being freed. These concepts also apply to the future church, but I will not go there until a little later.
Are you beginning to see the riddle presented to us? Here in Galatians 4:26, most people think that God is referring to the New Covenant of Jesus Christ as being the second freewoman, but that is not what God is saying based upon the allegorical information given to us. Since the Bible is clearly divided into two covenants, an old and a new, everyone has assumed that God is telling us about these two covenants, but that does not work with the allegorical ages of the women given. The only way you could get that information is to change the roles of Sarah and Hagar and flip the titles of free versus slave. We know from studying Genesis that Sarah was the older barren woman and she was nearly 90 years old when she gave birth to Isaac, the promised child. Hagar was the much younger Egyptian slave girl that Sarah gave to Abraham as being the one to bring forth an heir for Abraham. So by the time Hagar had a child, Sarah was around 76 years old and she was in covenant marriage with Abraham for a long time prior to Hagar becoming a wife. The Bible says that Abraham was 86 years old when Hagar had Ishmael. Then the Bible says Abraham was 100 years old when his wife Sarah had Isaac. This means there was a long time in between the two children. That would tell me that there was 14 years that Abraham waited for the promised child. Fourteen years is equal to two 7 year periods of time. How many years did Jacob have to work for his wife Rachel? Jacob I believe worked 14 years or two weeks of years. I guess I won’t go there either today. I just find repeated patterns in the Bible and see all kind of interesting things to teach on.
This new information is going to cause many people to get confused. How could God be in covenant with someone else before the Old Covenant in the Bible? That is the divine mystery being presented for your analysis. Do you understand that Sarah could not represent the New Covenant; since Sarah was married first to Abraham? Sarah has to represent a previous even older covenant before God’s covenant with natural Israel and this knowledge changes things up dramatically. Remember that Abraham in this allegory is the type for God who initiates covenants. Hagar represents a type of God’s wife Israel in the Old Testament (Jer 31:32). So Sarah must represent a covenant that God had a long time prior to natural Israel and this is very important for you to see. We therefore know from these facts that an “Ancient Covenant” existed before the “Old Covenant” came into effect. I call it the ancient covenant because God is called the ancient of days in the Bible and I thought that term fit. God the Father had to be in covenant with someone prior to the nation of Israel, or this allegory falls apart rapidly and that makes God a liar. Let’s look at the next verse in Galatians and get the solution to the puzzle:
Gal 4:26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
Wow, here is another Jerusalem being spoken of as a woman. We can see in this verse that the free woman Sarah is being described to be a type of the spiritual woman that was up in heaven where God’s throne resides. You can know this because “Jerusalem which is above” is definitely not the “Jerusalem that now is” here on the earth. Remember the names of the women are given from a human perspective of a man standing on the surface of the planet. If you look up you are looking into the heavens and this is the general direction of God’s throne. It makes logical sense for me to think of heaven as a preexisting place. We know that God is a Spirit (Jo 4:24) and that God is eternal. So the spiritual realm has existed with God forever. Did you notice that this new mature spiritual free woman is also named “Jerusalem” surprise, surprise! However her name is qualified to be the “Jerusalem which is above” and she is being directly compared to or differentiated from another wife named the “Jerusalem that is down below” on the earth. Next, the end of this verse reveals who this spiritual woman is. She is called the mother of us all. Who is “us all”? Or I should ask who is the “us all” that the context of this verse was written to? If you think naturally you would be clearly a confused Christian. The “Heavenly Jerusalem” is said to be our spiritual mother; she is directly called the mother of the church of Jesus Christ since Galatians was written to the church. Who is the church? The church is the daughter, the last woman in the family of God. What exactly is God revealing to us in this very key verse? What we have just discovered is that the “Heavenly Jerusalem” is not the “New Jerusalem” that came down from heaven in Revelation 21. Yes the New Jerusalem came from spiritual heaven, but she is not heaven. It is just like when I was born or came down from my natural mother, but I am not my natural mother. The New Jerusalem is the daughter of the Heavenly Jerusalem and that make her our direct spiritual mother. Are you beginning to see how this information fits the picture diagram of the family of 5 and do you see that every woman in the family of God is named “Jerusalem”? Who or what was this spiritual Jerusalem from above? Just like the analogy that I gave you earlier of the needle in the haystack approach to Bible study, you have to search for the clues in the Bible in order to find the truth and since I have already done this, I will save you a lot of time looking for another needle. Here is one of the best descriptions of this spiritual woman that I found:
Heb 12:22 But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,
Speaking to the Church of Jesus Christ, Paul writes that we have come unto Mt Zion and unto the city of the Living God! Then she is clearly named the “Heavenly Jerusalem”. This is a synonymous name for the “Jerusalem that is above” found in Galatians 4. We are then told that this city consisted of an innumerable company of angels. Angels are created spiritual beings that were resident with God in heaven before man existed. We are told very clearly that this is a spiritual woman that is also a city and then we are told where this city was located and who lived there (God and the angels). All of this information when combined with the allegorical information in Genesis 16 and Galatians 4 tells us that the Heavenly woman was the freewoman and that God was in covenant with all of these free angels in heaven prior to making a covenant with the natural nation of Israel. We can further surmise that this heavenly free woman was also described to be barren and unable to have any spiritual children for a long time, until after Israel is given to God for a wife and then this Hagar (Israel) has the fleshly heir (Jesus of Nazareth) and they two are cast out of the family of God. What God is revealing to you is that the natural man Jesus and His natural mother Israel cannot be heirs with the promised son. Wow, is this deep stuff or what? I really was not sure if I was even going to try to teach you those things today because they will be so controversial to many. However, if you did not know it, the natural man Jesus was never intended to be the heir of God, it was imperative for Satan to kill Him and for Him to be raised from the dead in order to become the promised child or the spiritual seed. Satan thought he was killing the heir of God, but in actuality he was sealing his own fate and dooming his future within God’s old heavenly family. When Jesus said “You must be born again”, He was including Himself in that requirement. Jesus Christ is called the “Firstborn from the dead” (Col 1:18). If Jesus was born again and was the first to become this way, He now has spiritual preeminence over all other spiritual beings, including the angels and natural humans on the earth. It also tells us that Satan and the other angels that were in covenant with God the Father are no longer in a covenant with God the Son, the risen chosen heir. This is really cool stuff, so I hope you are grasping what God is revealing to you. It is much more important than I can ever try to tell you.
Let me briefly make another point on the definition of what free vs. being in bondage or a slave means from a Bible perspective. Natural slavery is of course not a positive reality so spiritual slavery is the same level of negativity. Why are we being told that the natural nation of Israel is still in bondage and are still “slaves” today and that the heavenly spiritual beings are being called “free”? The only explanation that makes logical sense is to see that Israel was given God’s law to fulfill in order to be called righteous. I assume by that knowledge that the angels were righteous by default and even after sin was found in Lucifer; God was unable to convict Satan of wrong doing since there was no law in place to convict him. If you read the next chapter of Galatians you will hopefully see that God is immediately after speaking of a free woman and a bond woman is speaking about the law in these terms of bondage. Therefore, Israel is still in bondage because they are attempting to establish their own righteousness by works. This was not God’s intention for them, the Law was designed to point them to a need for a savior, but yet they still for the most part have not embraced the plan of Redemption provided by Jesus Christ. Do you understand what the concepts of free and slave means now? Are we now free in the church today? Uh Oh? That is a trick question because the answer is yes and no. We are not under the Law of Moses nor are we under the bondage of sin, Satan or this world, but we are still under the New Law of Jesus Christ who said “A new commandment I give to you”. So technically the church is eternally bound to the law of Love! Therefore, this is also further confirmation what the church is not the covenant that is representative of the type o the woman Sarah. The Church is not a Free Woman! The church is a purchased bride and that make us His property. If you do not agree with those statements, I’m sorry I just do not have time to explain them all today.
What was the daughter’s name in the family of 5? We know that the daughter is called the “New Jerusalem” and we now know that her mother is called the “Jerusalem Above” or I’ll call her the “Heavenly Jerusalem” because that is what God calls her in Hebrew 12:22. We are told the “Heavenly Jerusalem” is the spiritual mother of the spiritual church in Galatians 4:26. The Heavenly Jerusalem is being differentiated from both the “Earthly Jerusalem” and the “New Jerusalem” by definition and adjective qualification. If a woman is a mother, she cannot be her own daughter. This is an amazingly complex Bible study as you can tell. If you are not careful you will get lost very easily. Do you see what God is teaching us? Why are all of the females in God’s family, named Jerusalem? That is a really tough question to try to answer in a short Bible lesson but, is this cool or what? I personally believe that every woman in the family of God is named Jerusalem because every male in the family of God is named “Israel”. I really do not have the time to explain all of the scriptures that this belief is based upon in today’s lesson fully. But, I will give you some basic clues. Several times in the Old Testament God calls the people of Israel those people that are “called by my name”. You can see statements like these in verses; for example 2 Chronicles 7:14 and Jeremiah 7:10-14 to name two places for you to research. What you should observe is that God is saying Israel is my name and I gave it to you because you married me. The name change of Jacob to Israel; was it God’s idea or Jacob’s idea? I think when you read in Genesis you will see the angel of God gave Jacob this name because Jacob wrestles with him and prevailed. Therefore the name Israel came from God. Knowing these facts should change your perspective on how you view any verses that speak about Israel or Jerusalem in the Bible. I think the way that God does things in His Word are very multifaceted and extremely complicated and for me to say that I understand them all would be a joke. But, we now have three women who are representative of 3 separate cities all named Jerusalem in 3 different covenants with a God named Israel and this makes interpreting Bible prophecy correctly infinitely more complex.
In the Bible the name Jerusalem occurs over 800 times in over 700 different verses. Now I’m going to blow your mind, the name “Israel” occurs over 2300 times in the Bible. Why is the name Israel a dominant name or subject found in the Bible? I believe that is it is because the name points us to the True Living God and God is certainly the dominant theme found in the entire Bible. Based upon what we have learned today, we can never read a verse in the Bible about either Israel or Jerusalem and not stop and immediately ask, which one is God speaking about? Is it natural or is it spiritual? Is it new or is it old? Is it holy or is it unholy? If you assume God is speaking about only the earthly city of Jerusalem in the Middle East or the natural nation of Israel you would be wrong many, many times. God further complicates this problem by calling Jerusalem by many code names, symbolic names and other descriptive titles that I also cannot go into in this lesson. If you are interested in seeing some of these other names for the earthly city of Jerusalem you can read my lesson on “Names, Titles, Descriptions and Symbols of Jerusalem”.
I think I have gone long enough for one lesson. I know this is very complex and very new to you. I know you cannot find anyone else that is teaching it anywhere in the world. But, that does not mean it is not what is written in the Bible. All you have to do is to open your spiritual eyes and perceive what God is saying. This Bible study is probably the most important one that I have on my website. If you can understand this one, you can understand the rest of my lessons very easily. I’ll leave you today with a new picture of the spiritual family of God with all of the names of the women filled in:
I appologize for the long lesson today, I guess I had a lot to say. God Bless until next time!
If you would like to continue reading the next lesson in this series you may continue with “Part 8“.
Understanding the Hidden Spiritual Family Structure of God’s Household! Beginning to See the Identities of the Women in God’s Family! Part 6
(Ver 1.3) This is now Part 6 in a series of extremely advanced Bible studies about the Hidden Spiritual Structure of the Family of God. I have covered a tremendous amount of fresh information and several radically new concepts that I cannot take the time to go back and repeat them all. So if you have not read this series from the beginning I would strongly suggest that you go back and start reading with “Part 1”. Then as you go through the lessons, I would also recommend that you take notes on all of the key points. The ultimate goal of today’s lesson is to introduce you to the first woman in the family of God. I guess technically speaking she is my first woman, but she is the last woman in the family of God. But, God says the last shall be first and the first shall be last (Mat 19:30) so I think I am being scriptural to teach them in the reverse order. That was a joke! Today’s lesson will be focused primarily on the identity of just the woman who is titled the “daughter-in-law” in the family of God. You may recall that in the family of 5, we have 2 men and 3 women. While we are not given the ages of the family members, there are younger and older family members implied by the titles given. The son must be younger than his mother and his father and the daughter is also logically younger than her mother and her father. Therefore the most recent female in the family of God is the one that is called the “daughter” who subsequently becomes the “daughter-in-law” and both of these titles you will eventually discover apply to us, the Church of Jesus Christ. That is where we are going today in this lesson.
I have taught on this subject before, but not in the specific context to the family of God prophecy found in Micah 7:6 so I will repeat some things while I also explore some new subjects that I probably have never taught on before. As we continue through this lesson series you should begin to observe the fact that God uses repetitious patterns throughout the Bible. I will try to point out as many of these as I run across in today’s lesson. Learning to recognize patterns found in the Bible will assist you greatly in your knowledge and understanding of God’s Word. We will soon discover that this family of 5 was a hidden pattern found in many other parts of the Bible. For example, in an earlier lesson, I showed you that it was found in one place in Genesis 20:12 where God describes Abraham and Sarah’s relationship as a typical match for the family of 5 pattern revealed in Micah 7:6:
Gen 20:12 And yet indeed she is my sister; she is the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife.
God tells us that Sarah was Abraham’s half-sister and that they shared a common father, but that they each had different mothers. Abram and Sarai were therefore half brother and sister and they later married and became husband and wife. Because Abram’s father Terah is the head of this house, it technically does not matter how many wives that Terah had, they were all still in one family. This is precisely the 5 family members in one family with the exact titles given to us in Micah 7:6. There is a father, a son, a daughter, a mother of a daughter and finally the mother of the son who becomes the mother-in-law when the daughter Sari marries Abram. Do you think this was a coincidence that this occurs in the Bible like that or can you see that it is just a hidden typology like I believe it is? I am personally convinced that it was an Old Testament hidden pattern of God’s family. However, this type even goes further than that to fulfill the Micah 7:6 patterns. God also told Abraham to leave his parents and go to a land that He would show him.
Gen 12:1 Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee:
This is again a hidden typology of the precise division found within the family of 5 with the 3 parents being divided against the 2 younger children. Again if you think this is coincidence it would be a mistake to think that way. In this typology Abram is the son and is a type of Jesus who left His Father’s house in heaven to come to the earth, the land that God would show Him. Terah (Abram’s father) is of course a type of God the Father who ruled the Kingdom of Heaven. Sarai would be a type of the Church, the wife of the Lamb of God and we will get into this in much more depth soon. As in every O.T. type and shadow everything in the story is not a perfect match. Abraham took his father with him until he finally died. The fact that Lot was also taken in disobedience was another fact that eventually did occur when Abraham and Lot finally separated. A shadow will always be a recognizable pattern with some details omitted. That is just how it works. Later, I will show you some other 5 things split 3 against 2 as a repeated pattern in some very strange and unusual places in the Bible. I will try to show you one of these in the next lesson and another one in a future lesson. Just remember that nothing in the Bible occurs by chance or accident and everything has meaning and significance. God says the thing that has been is the thing that shall be again and I believe this law is based upon the reality of repeated patterns that have occurred and that will occur again. We are just now beginning to understand many of them, but that is the nature of how God works.
You may recall that I taught you the male members of the family were based upon the Trinity of God reality and that the Trinity contained the implied existence of females. But, let me briefly give you a synopsis of some other reasons that I believe that the male members in the Family of God are God the Father and Jesus, God the Son. One of the key rules that I always use to interpret the Bible, is to always allow the Bible to interpret itself. Because God is smarter than I am, I look for His meanings and definitions to help me understand what He is attempting to reveal. In other words I search to see if the Bible backs up what God says in other places. I always interpret the Bible using only the Bible and I do not search any other books, Bible lessons or commentaries for what some man thinks it says to justify my beliefs. If God does not confirm my beliefs with only His Word, then I change my beliefs to fit what He says. Otherwise I would just be teaching you my opinion and that would be worthless.
Mat 10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
From reading in Matthew 10:35 we should know that the Father and the Son are divided against each other. The Greek word translated as “father” in this verse in Matthew is G3962 and it literally means “the male parent”. Is this same word ever used to describe God in the N.T.? If it is not, my interpretation fails immediately. However, if you do a search using your computer, you should easily find that God is called by this exact Greek word title over 200 times in the N.T. In order to find these I did a case-sensitive search for the word “Father” and the Greek word G3962 to occur in the same verse. You can do the exact same thing if you do not believe me. Therefore, I have concluded that Jesus could have been literally talking about His Father God being the “Father” in Matthew 10:35, by direct and overwhelming scriptural word association. At the very least you cannot deny that it is not entirely possible based upon this overwhelming evidence. In Matthew 10:35 the son is called specifically a “man”. Therefore, we need to determine if Jesus is ever called a “man” in the Bible to confirm if this is also a possible interpretation. If we cannot find where Jesus is ever called a man, this would shoot down my interpretation categorically. The Greek word translated as “man” in Matthew 10:35 is G444 and it literally means “manfaced” or “male human being”. Was Jesus a male human being?
Luk 12:53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
As you can see in Luke 12:53, Jesus used a different word for this individual male and it says the father (G3962) will be divided against the “son” (G5207). Was Jesus ever called a “son” G5207? If you again search your Bible you will find over 80 Bible verses where Jesus is directly called both a “Son” and a “Man” (G5207 and G444) in the same verse. Again you do this by searching for both Greek words G444 and G5207 as well as the case sensitive “Son” all in the same verse, your results should match my results. Finally if you search the N.T. to see how many total times Jesus was ever called a “Son”, you can find over 200 times in the New Testament where Jesus is directly called a “Son” (G5207). Jesus is either called the “Son of God” or the “Son of Man” in more verses than I could try to name in this lesson. This is just more confirming overwhelming evidence for the identities of both of the male members of the Family of God. We can find scriptures that say God is a “Father” and we can find scriptures that say Jesus is both a “Son” and a “Man”. Again using this evidence it does not conclusively confirm that God the Father and God the Son are the two male members in the family of 5 that Jesus was describing to us, but it also does not rule them out to fit the interpretation either. Try to search the Bible and find another father and son combination mentioned over 400 times that fits with the exact same 5 family relationship titles. None that I searched for even came close. Father Abraham is only mentioned together in a total of 30 verses in the entire Bible. No other father and son dominate the Bible like God and His Son Jesus. The evidence is overpowering to me, but I’m sure we will come across some skeptics out there who can come up with reasons why they are not God the Father and His Son Jesus Christ. If is funny that God will always allow you to make the choice to be wrong. God will never prove anything in the Bible beyond a reasonable doubt. If God did that He would leave no one any freewill choice to believe or not to believe and God is not going to do that.
I guess I need to review another aspect that is important to know for our Bible study today. I want to give you a couple of verses that God reveals some very relevant information about His family. I taught on these verses before, but I will reemphasize them for your further benefit in today’s lesson to make sure you understand what is being stated:
Eph 3:14 For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,
Eph 3:15 Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,
You should be able to see that these verses clearly inform us that God the Father has or at the very least had a spiritual family. This verse further implies that God the Father is the Head of this family. In this verse we are told the specific location of this family and it is explicitly stated to be in two separate realms of reality. One is a spiritual dimension called heaven and the other is a physical dimension found here on the earth. Wow, that is very clear to me. God is also clearly stated to be the named and titled Father (G3962) in this family and Jesus is clearly implied to be the Son in this family. The implication is given that the family is very large in order to reside in the fullness of these two separate dimensions. I also want to point out that we are told that this family has God’s name. This is clearly self-evident that God the Father was the spiritual head of the household and that He is also the husband in a relationship with a wife in order to have a Son and to give them all, His name. Taking the husband’s name during marriage is a standard practice and tradition originated from God, but it is often times ignored in the modern world. The modern wife sometimes does not always desire to take the name of her husband when they are married, but this is clearly not how God intended it to be.
If you search the O.T. closely you will get some more confirmation in serveral verses that say people on the earth have been given God’s name like in a marriage. We can find some of these verses in 2 Chronicles 7:14, Isaiah 43:7, Jeremiah 7:10, 11, 14, 30, 25:29, 32:34, 34:15 and Daniel 9:18-19. If the family of God has been given His name, what is this name? That is a very tough question to try to answer in a concise manner, since God is revealed by many names in the Bible. I think I will not even try to answer that question today, because it will take too long to get you to see it. For now, just try to see the fact that God’s family is called by His name and this implies that a marriage has taken place. What I want you to do right now, is to dig a little deeper and see what else these verses in Ephesians are saying? Often to see the deep things of God, you need to look up the word definitions to see what they say in the original languages or learn what God’s definition of the words are in other parts of the Bible. I want you to focus in on the Greek word translated as “family” and see what is revealed in it:
As if feminine of a derivative of G3962; paternal descent, that is, (concretely) a group of families or a whole race (nation): – family, kindred, lineage.
Many times in the Greek language one word is derived from another word which is the case in this definition. Often times the gender of either a male or a female is also assigned within the definition and this is exactly the case for both the word GG3965 and G3962 that it is derived from. This Greek word has some awesome detailed information within it according to the Strong’s definition. The general definition is concerning children that have descended from their parents. But, also notice that the usage of the word is not limited to a single generation and that it can apply to all of the generational descendants. This Greek word is very much like a family tree diagram containing all of the family’s relatives in the lineage that originated from the specific set of parents. But, it actually goes way beyond that as you can see. This word G3965 can refer to the entire nation of people that have descended for example from a specific named man like a Jacob. This is another common pattern found throughout the Bible. You will see many men stated in Genesis that originated nations that were spread out over the globe. Almost any nation of people mentioned in the Bible can be traced back to the originator who was the father of them all. As you should know Jacob was the originator of the natural nation of Israel here on the earth. But, God changed his name from Jacob to Israel. Where did this name come from? Can this be the answer to my question earlier of what God’s name is that was given to his family on the earth? I believe that it is but I still can’t explain that fully right now. I will tell you that I am convinced that Israel is God’s name and we will learn more about why I believe that as we continue. I will tell you that the definition in Strong’s dictionary for the name “Israel” means “He will rule as God”. Now knowing the definition of the name “Israel” does that help you to determine who the name actually belongs to? Who will rule as God except for God?
Please notice that this Greek word translated as “family” is said to be a feminine derivative of the Greek word G3962. This Greek word G3962 is the counter masculine reference to the male parent, so the “family” word G2965 is referring to a female family member only. Is this not the pictured pattern of creation and Adam and Eve? Doesn’t the Bible say that Adam came first and then Eve was formed (1 Tim 2:13) and that she was taken from Adam? Uh oh? It seems that God does have women in His spiritual family after all and that these women can be found both in heaven and on the earth. I also believe that God is giving you a repeated clue to where women come from in both the natural as well as the spiritual realms. They are always taken from the male. I firmly believe that the origination of all these things is from God who is concretely called a male throughout the Bible. But we also understand from reading 1 Corinthians 11 that there is a circular pattern within God’s creation. From the man came the first woman, and after that every new man came through a woman. Wow this is really deep. Nothing self-exists or created itself, except for God the Father. So if God describes a spiritual woman she must have originated from God the Father. But, we also understand that a woman can conceive and produce others like her, either natural or spiritual. I hope you are beginning to see that repeated patterns is a dominate theme found within the Bible. God uses these types of patterns because they work first, but also because we can learn about one and can easily apply what we learned to the others. When Eve was taken from the side of Adam, I am convinced that this was a spiritual pattern that existed before in heaven and that it is a further prophetical pattern to what will occur again. I know all of these assertions are very complex statements and I do not have time to fully explain them all in the level of detail that I need to today. If you are struggling with any of my statements, please be patient and continue to learn as much as you can and hopefully I will cover everything that I need to share as I continue.
Here is where I will start to deviate a little bit from many natural dominated thinking people. I do not believe that a spiritual woman is exactly like what we think of when we think of natural women on the earth. However, I believe that they both certainly do possess very similar characteristics and features. Consider this Greek word G3965 again. It seems to at least imply the existence of a female which can be defined as an entire nation of people (including males and females). This will become increasingly more apparent as I continue today as I attempt to describe to you a spiritual woman in the family of God. I think now is the time to introduce you to the last woman in the family of God. I want to identify her by examining her title as she is called in Matthew 10:35 and Luke 12:53 to be the “daughter-in-law” and then I will search the Bible for God’s usage and definition of this word to find out how the subject is developed in the other key parts of the Bible. Let’s first examine the Greek definition of the word G3565, translated as “daughter-in-law” in Matthew 10:35 and Luke 12:53:
From a primary but obsolete verb νύπτωnuptō (to veil as a bride; compare the Latin “nupto”, to marry); a young married woman (as veiled), including a betrothed girl; by implication, a son’s wife: – bride, daughter in law.
Here is the Strong’s definition of the Greek word translated as “daughter-in-law” from Matthew 10:35 and Luke 12:53. This definition is also very revealing in what it contains. A daughter-in-law is clearly defined to be a “son’s wife”. Uh Oh, again? Fortunately for us we have a Son in the family of God that is qualified by title to be her husband. She is also synonymously called the “bride” in the sense of a marriage ceremony being performed to someone’s son. Of course Jesus is this Son, but does He also have a wife? I have heard many preachers say that the church is not the Bride of Christ, yet these men speak out and teach in error and prove their ignorance of God and the rest of the subjects under discussion in this lesson. If you have read my other Bible lessons you already know that a covenant is a marriage in the eyes of God (Malachi 2:14, Jeremiah 31:32). If you do not understand this you should go read the lesson series about “Understanding Bible Covenants”. So if Jesus is the Son of God in this family we should be able to recognize that the church is the woman that is now in covenant marriage to Him. Are you in the New Covenant with Jesus? If you answer that question yes, then you are the Bride of Christ. This direct knowledge would make the church the “daughter-in-law” in the family as well as the “daughter”. But, we will need to confirm this information using the Bible rather than to speculate or assume its existence. It is very interesting that this Greek word translated as “daughter-in-law” in Matthew 10:35 and Luke 12:53 is only used a total of 6 other times in the entire N.T. In the majority of every other reference in the Bible when it is used, it is always being associated to Jesus as the Groom with this word being His bride. Do you think that is a clue for us? Let’s go find out. The first time you can find this word (G3565) after Matthew and Luke, it is used in the book of John:
Joh 3:29 He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom’s voice: this my joy therefore is fulfilled.
Here is some very strong evidence for the identities of these two family members in the family of 5 and they are indirectly called the “son” and the “daughter-in-law”. In this verse, John the Baptist is speaking about Jesus and he is describing Jesus to be the “Bridegroom” with the “bride”. The term “bride” here is the exact same Greek word used as “daughter-in-law” from our riddle. John could have actually said, “He that has the daughter-in-law is the bridegroom”. I do not know how it can be any clearer than that. Jesus actually calls Himself the “Bridegroom” in several places like Matthew 9:15, 25:5, Mark 2:19-20 and Luke 5:34-35. I believe this is God’s way of giving us very specific clues about a hidden family structure. God uses very specific words in limited capacity to show us related verses spread out in random patterns. God is definitely revealing the identities of two of the family members directly and others are implied by logical association. For example, you never have a bride without a mother of the bride also existing previously. You never have a son without a mother-in-law of the bride also existing. You will also never have a son without a father and that is everyone in the entire family that Jesus named. It is now time to show you the direct named identity of the bride (daughter-in-law) in the Bible. This is the woman that has married the son in the family of God. Here is another scripture that you need to look at very closely:
Rev 21:2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
Here in this verse we have a bride and her husband directly named. Knowing the definition of the Greek word G3565 (bride), we can easily substitute the word translated here as “bride” for the synonym “daughter-in-law” and make the verse say this legally:
Rev 21:2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a daughter-in-law (bride) adorned for her husband.
Because God has used the exact same word from Matthew 10:35 and Luke 12:53, I believe that God is making a direct confirmation and a connection to who the identity of the bride is, in the family of 5. We can clearly see the connection based upon this titled commonality. Please recall that a commonality is a shared characteristic or feature of two separate entities. But, it also helps us in logical discussions to identify the same entity being spoken of in two different places in the Bible. If we can find enough shared attributes it makes it very easy to conclude that the one is the same as the other. When you are interpreting the Bible, these are the types of clues that you are looking for. You want to find shared connections that help you to establish the truth. God is a highly intelligent being and He never chooses His words randomly. Every word of God has a designed purpose and it is an intentional carrier of the knowledge, understanding and wisdom of God. However, God did not write the Bible in a simple text book style of writing with easily laid out facts and bullet lists of every displayed subject. God intentionally wrote the Bible more in a designed shotgun shell approach that spreads the information out in seemingly random patterns. God did this so that He could conceal the information until the time that it could be revealed.
Let me briefly tell you about two laws of Bible interpretation that will hopefully help you in understanding the Bible. There is the Law of First mention that is used by God to help define a subject under discussion. You can go back and find the first time the subject is mentioned and you should be able to learn something that will help you to understand the entire subject. I use this law frequently in my Bible interpretations and it has never failed me. Conversely by the law of opposition or opposites, if there exists a law of first mention, there must also exist a law of last mention. It is exactly like if you are told about north you must logically assume there exists a south. If the law of first mention introduces you to a subject, then by the law of last mention, the subject must be concluded in those verses. So when I looked up the Greek word translated as “daughter-in-law” I immediately found the last woman with this title in the book of Revelation. Reading in Revelation 21 and 22 she is called this title of “Bride” 3 times and this is conclusive proof that this is the last woman that will be in covenant with the living God. Ok, I just taught you a bunch of stuff in one paragraph that is very important. I pray that you did not let it blow right by you.
What I want you to see is that the bride or the daughter-in-law revealed in this verse in Revelation has a name and this is exactly what we are looking for to solve the riddle. We are intentionally trying to find the names of all of the women in the Family of God and here is the first name that is very important to learn about. I have taught on this subject multiple times in other lessons, so I will not repeat everything all over again, but I will try to hit the important points. The name of the woman is directly called “New Jerusalem”. That is a very revealing and important name. First off the word “new” is an adjective qualifier that separates this Jerusalem from every other Jerusalem. If I say “I have a new car” you immediately know that this car is not the same as my “old car”. I would have to omit the “new” adjective from the statement and say “I just fixed my car” or “look at my car” for you to understand that it could possibly be the same car that I already had. This is a fact that you need to understand completely. To qualify something means you have modified the meaning of the noun and limited the scope of it’s definition or you have restricted the definition by giving everyone a specific case exception. Do you understand this concept? If it was not important, I would not be asking you this question. If you do not understand this concept, please go and look up the word “qualify’ in an online dictionary and find the definition that I have given you and then look for examples of its usage and application. You can also explore the subject of adjectives and see how they are utilized within the English language. What I am trying to say is that the “New Jerusalem” is not the same Jerusalem found throughout the Bible. I do not know why this concept causes many Christians to get confused, but it does do that.
The word “Jerusalem” occurs well over 700 times in the Bible and that is a lot of verses to analyze all of them. It is widely taught by many Christians and theologians that every verse that names Jerusalem is God speaking about the same natural city found in the middle-east today. However, I have discovered a greater truth found in the Bible and we must consider this new information in order to interpret these other 700 verses correctly. The first time “Jerusalem” occurs directly it appears to be in the book of Joshua chapter 10. It would appear reading down the chapter that Jerusalem existed prior to the nation of Israel possessing it. Interesting isn’t it? It would also appear that this city was inhabited by “Jebusites” prior to Israel taking it. It further says in the Bible that before Jerusalem was called by this name it was originally called “Jebus”. The word translated as Jebus means “trodden”. I could very easily get off the main subject and probably write you a book about the subject of Jerusalem, but I will not do that today. What I want you to embrace is a fact that the New Jerusalem in Revelation 21:2 is NOT the same city as most other places that Jerusalem is mentioned in the Bible. The natural city of Jerusalem in the Middle East today is not the city that is described to be coming down from heaven in this verse in Revelation 21:2. There are many reasons that I say that, but I do not have time to explain them all today.
Another aspect that is essential to grasp from Revelation 21:2, is the fact that God says a spiritual woman is a “city”. This concept is very close to the definition of the Greek word G3965 where we discovered a woman could be viewed as a nation of related people. God uses a city as a symbolic representation for a far greater spiritual truth. The book of Revelation is covered with symbolic language and this helps us to understand the unseen spiritual things that are written there. This is also God’s way of giving you a definition without saying this is a definition. Since the city is coming down from heaven we must logically conclude that she is a spiritual representation and not an actual physical city. If you examine the Bible very closely you will observe this is another repeatable pattern found in some very unusual places. A city in the Bible is often referred to as a female, a mother, a daughter, a sister or a bride. For example, a city is again called a woman in Revelation 17:18. However, this woman is named “Mystery Babylon the Great” and she is called the mother of whores. I could give you many more Bible examples of a city being described to be a woman, but I believe I have made my point.
This city in Revelation 21:2 is also called a “Holy” city and that again disqualifies all the other cities with the same name that do not possess the “holy” attribute. These are not hard concepts to grasp; but they are difficult for many religious people to accept because they have been taught wrong. It is many times very difficult to overcome the false doctrines of men because most of them were never taught to intentionally deceive people. Most preachers who teach in error do so out of ignorance and not for intentional evil deception. Many very good Christians have taught erroneous doctrines and totally believed they were true. I guess I need to get back to my main subject.
Let me briefly try to explain exclusion using qualifier words to separate things. If I have 5 cars parked in my driveway and I hand you some car keys and say go drive the “blue” car to the store and buy us some food. With this verbal statement, I have excluded every other car that is not blue. You immediately know that the keys that I just gave you do not fit or start the red car, or the green car, or the yellow car or even the white car. This is what God is doing with the adjectives of “New” and “Holy” and He is describing to you a “city” that never existed before and the keys that He has given to you only fits this “new holy” city. God has linked a “bride” and a “daughter-in-law” directly to a city named Jerusalem and God separates her using two evocative adjectives of holy and new. By the law of opposition or opposites, we understand that this means this bride is not the unholy Jerusalem and neither is she the old or the previous Jerusalem and that is some very powerful hidden information to who the other two women are in the family of God. But we will not get to them until later as we continue to learn. Remember the prophecy of Micah 7:6? It says the daughter will be opposed to her mother and the daughter-in-law will be opposed to her mother-in-law. These are exclusionary acts of God being stated. Since the New Jerusalem is both the daughter and the daughter-in-law we must logically associate that a division is occurring between that which was unholy and that which was old from this newly revealed bride. A separation is occurring of one woman from two other women. God is separating one new city from two other cities. God is separating one new covenant from two previous covenants. Wow, I’m not sure if I should have told you that yet. Hang in there and I’ll prove it all later. Let’s define the word Holy to see what God is saying to us.
From H6942; a sacred place or thing; rarely abstractly sanctity: – consecrated (thing), dedicated (thing), hallowed (thing), holiness, (X most) holy (X day, portion, thing), saint, sanctuary.
From ἅγοςhagos (an awful thing) compare G53, [H2282]; sacred (physically pure, morally blameless or religious, ceremonially consecrated): – (most) holy (one, thing), saint.
Here are definitions for both the Greek and the Hebrew words translated as “holy”. There are many words here that are relevant to see. To sanctify or to consecrate are both concepts that means to set apart. Again we have the concept of division occurring. It is funny how God repeats patterns in the Bible over and over. The word sanctify comes from another word that means “to make clean”. I cannot personally read any of these definitions and not think of myself and the rest of the church of Jesus Christ. In the Word of God it is the church that are called to be as saints, we have been sanctified and set apart, bought with a price and we were cleansed by the blood of the Lamb. The only “holiness” that humans possess is that which has been freely given to us by the grace of God. However, this free gift of righteousness qualifies us for being holy. I feel very confident that the Church is scripturally qualified to be this Holy City called the New Jerusalem, but we will get more confirming witnesses to help you see it.
1Pe 2:9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:
Why does God call the church a “Holy Nation of people”? These are all spiritual names, titles and descriptions of us His new Bride. This bride is however a spiritual woman in covenant with Jesus now. We therefore as a holy nation of people qualify to be the city that is named Holy Jerusalem. I sure hope you are getting what I am teaching today. If you do it is going to help you more than I can say. Once you understand what I am teaching you will know who you are in Christ and what your position of responsibility is in His family. You may continue to read down in Revelation 21 and see two more references to the Bride of Christ that I do not have time to go into today. They basically say the same things that we have already said, but they give us a second witness to the name of the new “daughter’-in-law”. In Revelation 21:9 we are specifically told the husband is the Lamb of God and this connects Jesus to be both the groom and the son in the family. As I continue through this series you will soon begin to see a pattern of cities, women, and covenants that are repeated. The transition will be from spiritual to natural and then back to spiritual and I wish you knew what I knew to understand that statement. Just keep it in mind as you continue to learn.
I want to make an interesting point here for the sake of argument. Is Jesus Christ married to a city of buildings and architectural structures or is He married to the people in the city. Does the city represent people or buildings? What is a city in your definition? Wow, these are tough ones! I have heard several preachers try to claim that the buildings in the city is what makes up the bride for Jesus and since the church is the Body of Christ, they try to tell us that this city is also our bride. But, does God care for building structures or for people structures? Did Jesus die for to save a city or for the people in the city? Perhaps you think that John 3:16 says “God so loved the city of Jerusalem that He gave His only begotten son…”. You should begin to see that Jesus is not in covenant with architectural building structures, He is in covenant with the people that make up this spiritual structure. But it is much more complex than that statement. The Bible tells us that God is building a new city, but it also says that we (the church) are that city:
1Pe 2:5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.
Hopefully you can see what God is saying in this verse. God is not building a natural building, the city location in Revelation 21:2 was purely a symbolic reference for a greater spiritual truth. We are the living building blocks for God’s new dwelling place. The word translated as “house” is a Greek word G3624 that means “a family”. There are many implied meanings to these words. God is building a New Family structure to replace the old family structure. You could also say based upon what we have learned God is building a Holy family structure to replace the unholy family structure. God qualifies this family to be a Spiritual House and a new Family and that means it is not a natural one or even one that ever existed before. The spiritual dimension is an unseen realm of existence to us presently here in the natural realm. I also want to point out that this New Family being built is associated with Jesus Christ, the Bridegroom, the Lamb of God, the Son of God who is our covenant husband.
Let’s shift our focus on another reference of Christ and His Bride found in the Bible. If you read the fifth chapter of Ephesians very closely you will discover that God is speaking about a dominant subject of marriage in relationship to husbands and wives. Now remember that a wife is always a daughter-in-law so this chapter applies to our study. God talks about this natural subject and says many words of instruction for our benefit. However in this chapter God has intertwined a spiritual reality that also applies to us the church. God then ends the entire discussion with a bomb shell unveiling of a great mystery. Since we are studying about the bride, the daughter-in-law and the marriage to the son we must conclude that this chapter is specifically related to information that we need to understand about our subject. If you read down the entire chapter you will see many things being intermixed between natural things and spiritual things. The natural husband is instructed how to treat his natural wife and the natural wife is instructed how to treat he natural husband. But, during this discussion, God is also speaking about Jesus and the church using the exact same terms. Finally when you get down to verses 30 through 32 God reveals that this is a great mystery and that He is telling us that Jesus is married to His wife the church. If you do not understand this I have many other lessons that go into this in more detail. We have basically seen enough witnesses to confirm the identities of at least 3 of the main family members in the family of 5. So I’ll give you most of this information in a synopsis picture format so that you can see it more clearly or at least visually.
You may not still know who the mother is or who the mother-in-law is, but we will discover those two women in the next lesson hopefully. I know I did not give you every scripture that I could have in order to limit the size of the lesson. So if you would like to understand more of the details about the Bride of Christ being the church you can go read my lesson series called “Understanding the Bride of Christ”. Also read my series called “Understanding the Book Ruth”. You see in the book of Ruth, she is specifically called a “daughter-in-law” and since there are not that many women with this title given to us in the Bible, she must apply to the church as an Old Testament typology and her husband must also be a type of Jesus. Hopefully you know that her husband was Boaz and that he is called the Kinsman redeemer. All of this information fits with us the Gentile church (Ruth) and Jesus Christ (Boaz) our redeemer with amazing accuracy. I think I have gone long enough for today and we will continue in the next lesson to identify the other women called the “mother” and the “mother-in-law”. I hope and pray that you are learning with an open mind. I know it is totally new to you and I know it is complex beyond our imagination. I have been attempting to teach it in concise chunks that are manageable while attempting to simplify the subjects as much as I can. Hopefully after I finish the next two lessons in this series you will have sufficient knowledge and understanding to be able to share it with others. Thanks for taking the time to study the Bible with me and may the God of creation continue to bless you tremendously in your inner man to give you the spiritual eyes to perceive what He wants you to know. Until next time continue to fight the good fight of faith.
If you would like to continue reading in this series, you may go to “Part 7” now!
Understanding the Hidden Spiritual Family Structure of God’s Household! Major Concepts Review! Part 5
(Ver 1.3) This is now Part 5 in a series of extremely advanced spiritual Bible studies that reveal God’s wisdom as He uses several divine riddles, puzzles, allegories and symbolisms of enormous complexity to hide some truths in the Bible about the spiritual family of God. Since it has been a long time since I taught in this series, I plan on doing a review lesson of the important concepts given so far while I will also introduce some new perspectives on these topics to help us better understand them. If you think that you know everything that the Bible says because you have read it or even studied it for many years, you have probably fallen into a state of deception that has caused you to over estimate your knowledge of the hidden truth found in the Bible or under estimate God’s ability to hide information. This series of lessons should prove to you how little you actually know of God’s Word if nothing else. I have been studying the Bible for many years and one of the main things that God has revealed to me, is the fact that the more that I know the more I find out that I still need to learn. If you are not there yet, you have a long way to go and many things left to see. Perhaps you did not understand my last comment. I have spoken to many, many highly educated doctors in my life and I noticed one general trait that most all of them possessed. None of them thought they that knew everything. Whenever a doctor who has gone to school for many more years than most other professions, comes across a situation that goes beyond their current expertise, they most of the time pass you off to a specialist who knows more than they do in that area. This is a very humble approach to take for any human. Humans do not generally like to admit that they do not know everything. I wish more Christians would take this attitude. However, I have seen the opposite with many Christians, where those who know the least, think that they know the most and speak out the loudest about things they clearly do not understand. Why are people like that? I believe that it could be a pride issuewhere people lack humility to admit their own weaknesses. I wish I understood how to answer that. I think God looks at people with astonishment also when they think so highly of themselves. I remember when God was speaking to Job and He said to Job “Who is this that darkens counsel with words that have no knowledge (Job 38:2). I think Job forgot who he was speaking to. I also think that God was speaking a clear message to anyone today that thinks too highly of themselves and their opinions and since that was not my titled subject, I’ll move on. Sorry for the initial side trip.
The main goal of the next few lessons in this series will be to reveal the mystery of the hidden spiritual female family members of God’s household. I have already shown you that the male family members are God the Father and God the Son. But God has revealed to us in the Bible that He also has females in His heavenly family and this new information is potentially controversial because it is based upon new revelations that are not widely known nor taught anywhere and therefore they could easily be rejected by readers. People often times reject new things automatically because they cannot find any collaborating evidence other than the Bible for what is being taught. I have had people come to me asking me for my credentials, accreditation or for my mentoring or collaborating teachers that I learned what I was teaching from, but all I have to give them is the Spirit of God and the Words written in the Bible. This is the only evidence that should be necessary, but they are looking for a human expert in the world to confirm the message and this is a very dangerous approach to take when studying the Bible. Satan will send you an expert someday to fulfill your itching ears and you will fall for his deception, if you do not know what the Bible actually says.
However, this is the normal beginning for any new revelation from God; you will always be presented the opportunity to either see it or it will cause you to withdraw from it simply because it does not fit with your current church denomination’s doctrine or what your pastor teaches to you to be the truth. Too many Christians trust the words of man, instead of trusting the Word of God. What you must realize is that this is not something new for today. This was a major challenge that the early church was faced with continually. God brought out new revelation after new revelation and there were no seminaries or Bible experts present to confirm the message spoken by Paul. Paul would come and teach a completely new radical revelation to the church and they would have to first be open to hear the new information and then they were required to go and prove it using only the Old Testament books of the law and the prophets (Acts 17:11). If you think this was easy for them to do, you would be wrong. I’m convinced that Paul had as many problems as I have had and probably many more. If you think this part of the lesson does not apply to you today, you would again be wrong. I state all of this at the beginning as a warning in order to help set the expectation level in your mind for learning something new. God clearly tells us the thing that has been is the thing that shall be again (Ecc 1:9). So I believe that we are in a cycle of that which has happened to the early church is that which is happening again to us before Jesus returns. God clearly prophesies to us about the former and later rains in Joel 2:23 and Zec. 10:1. But, few Christians understand what spiritual rain is. God speaks of natural rain symbolically to help teach us about spiritual things that are poured out and fall from heaven. I take this type of rain to be revelation, knowledge and understanding from the Spirit of God and His word. What else can it be? God is not going to give us any new books to the Bible? So He must be going to tell us about the books that we already have that were written for our benefit and this information will help us to understand them.
In this series of lessons I will be teaching things from the Bible that are radically new and different, but that does not mean they are not what God has said, so open up your spiritual eyes and ears and perceive with your heart the things that God is about to say today. I think I said this before, but I’ll repeat it for emphasis; this is one of the most important revelations of the Word of God that God has given to me up until this point in time. If you study it closely you should begin to understand why I say that. I believe the knowledge found in this series will open up the Bible to you like never before as it has for me. Because of this revelation I am able to teach almost any other subject in the Bible with a greater understanding. It should cause you to understand several new things in the Bible also, like the identities of the women in the book of Revelation. There are two or three women in the book of Revelation that are not named directly nor identified spiritually or scripturally unless you understand who the women are in the family of God. This new knowledge should also help you to know your God like never before to see why He is doing certain things that you never understood before. If you have not read this series from the beginning, I would strongly recommend that you go back and start reading with Part 1. Let’s start by reviewing the family diagram that I gave you in the last lesson and then we will look at the original prophecy of the family found in Micah 7:6.
Mic 7:6 For the son dishonoureth the father, the daughter riseth up against her mother, the daughter in law against her mother in law; a man’s enemies are the men of his own house.
Only this diagram will fit to solve the riddle given to us in Micah 7:6, Luke 12:53 and Matthew 10:35 where God tells us about the specific individuals in His spiritual family. You may not understand the diagram yet, but we can only learn new things in progressive steps. Of course we are challenged to find out who or what God is speaking of in Micah 7:6, because God clearly does not reveal it to us directly. This is the nature and just some of the methods that God uses for “Hiding the Truth in Plain Sight”. If you want to learn more about this subject you can go read that series of lessons where I discuss it in more depth. God does not always tell you everything in any one verse and since Micah 7:6 is presented to us in a riddle format it makes it almost impossible for a natural thinking man to figure out what is being revealed. What I have discovered in my Bible studies is that God spreads out information in seemingly random patterns; much like a farmer sowing seeds by hand. You scatter the seeds and you do not know exactly where any one of them will fall. However, God knew exactly where every seed would fall and He has designed the Bible in a fashion that is very intelligent. I have discovered that God will present to us clues in multiple books of the Bible and we are required to find them and to put them together correctly in order to understand the picture. This of course is impossible without God’s help.
God tells us that these are all family members from exactly one house and that they are related to each other using the 6 standard, but uniquely individual family relationship titles given to us in Micah 7:6. You will have to read the clues found in Luke 12:52 to find out how many family members these 6 titles actually represent. We are told by Jesus that there are exactly 5 different family members within God’s spiritual family instead of the 6 that we thought originally. Again, this information just makes the riddle more complex to narrow the scope of possible solutions to help us solve it. Let’s review the list of family titles given to us:
- Father against his son
- Mother against her daughter
- Mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law
There are exactly two males given to us in the list, so we must conclude that the other four female titles represent only 3 women, in order to resolve the clue that said there were only a total of 5 members. Each family member is uniquely identifiable to show us their individual separation while concurrently demonstrating their distinctive common oneness at each specific level of their family relationships. I’m not sure if you understood that last statement or not. Let me try to briefly explain what I meant. First let’s examine their individual titles that separate them; there were three sets of pairs given to us; a father and his son, a mother and her daughter and finally a mother-in-law and her daughter-in-law. Only the women’s titles are potentially overlapping where one woman can possess simultaneous titles. The father can never be his son and vice versa. A mother can never be her daughter and vice versa. Using this same logic we can determine that the mother-in-law can never be her daughter-in-law and vice versa. But, a mother can become a mother-in-law or a daughter could become a daughter-in-law simply by the association of a marriage.
Let me speak to another obvious but often missed part of logical problem solving. If one object is stated to be against or in opposition to another object, they cannot be the same object. Do you understand that statement? For example, God says the son will against the father and therefore we understand the son is not the father. This logic is repeated for each opposing pair. The daughter is against her mother so the daughter is not the mother. The daughter-in-law is against her mother-in-law so the daughter-in-law is not the mother-in-law. This was just basic common sense using logical observation of the stated words given to us by God. Using these types of logic I simply concluded that the daughter and the daughter-in-law were the only two that could be same woman. They are never mentioned to be opposed to each other and since they both contain a form of the “daughter” title they can be more easily associated to be the same woman. You see what I mean? Of course the mother and the mother-in-law both have the same name mother in common and they were both someone’s daughters so many will try to ask can they not be the same woman? That is a good question, why don’t you see if you can draw me a family diagram that has one father and one mother where the mother is both the mother and the mother-in-law and then all of the other titles are also present and the total number of people in the family is five. If you can do that I would love to see it. You see the only diagram that I came up like that was one like I gave you in an earlier lesson that duplicated Adam and Eve’s family with their son Seth and his wife. They would have all of the titles give to us but only be four in one family and the daughter and the daughter-in-law would be in opposition to each other twice in duplication. That just doesn’t make any sense to me.
Solving the riddle diagram was a major part of discovery process from the previous lessons. You see I tried to show you in the last lesson that a “daughter-in-law” title dictates a wedding has occurred. It further stipulates by definition that someone’s son has married the bride and that the bride has now become the son’s parents’ new daughter-in-law. In this spiritual family of God, who is the Son of God? We of course know that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and therefore He is the only one qualified to marry the woman called the new daughter-in-law. If this is true, which it must logically be, only the daughter is qualified to become the daughter-in-law also called the son’s wife from the family of 5 titles that were given to us. You see you never as a son would marry your mother or your mother-in-law so I ruled those two women out immediately. This forces us to conclude that the unmarried daughter is also the daughter-in-law and this knowledge resolves the difference between the six titles and only 5 family members that the riddle presented to us. Wow, I hope and pray that you understood all of my logical reasoning in solving this riddle up until this point, because it only gets more complicated from here forward.
Before I get to the new subject of commonalities, let’s get into a new perspective found within a family called structure. Let’s stop and get some definitions for the word “structure”:
- mode of building, construction, or organization; arrangement of parts, elements, or constituents: a pyramidal structure.
- something built or constructed, as a building, bridge, or dam.
- complex system considered from the point of view of the whole rather than of any single part: the structure of modern science
All of these definitions are applicable to the family of God. God’s family is a designed construction effort. God’s family has organization and different parts that are specifically arranged to benefit the whole. God’s family as we have seen is a very complex system and God presents it in a riddle that no man was able to figure out until now. Within every normal and healthy family on the earth there is an organized structure of responsibility and authority. A father is called the head of the house and he holds ultimate responsibility for the entire family. The mother of the family comes next in authority and she helps raise the children with her husband. The children in the family are always the lowest on the authority food chain, yet they are very important because of the love that their parents have for them. From the Bible we also understand that children have ranking authority and responsibility. The first born child is always the oldest and will ultimately take the lead within the family after the father is gone. The next born is then the next in line if something should happen to the older sibling and etc. down the line of children to the youngest. Since I am teaching about the structure of God’s spiritual family, keep this authority structure information in mind as we continue. Practically everything that you read in the Bible about families will apply to God and His family in some way.
Within the family structure of the 5 individuals in the one family, we will discover the presence of several hierarchical sub-divisions that are present to establish order and organized structure. If you know anything about an orchestra, you have a conductor who is the head or the leader of everyone. You can also have different sections like a percussion section which contains a multiple tiered responsibility organization within itself. You can have a brass section also with another multi-tiered responsibility sub-division. There are other sub-divisions like wood-winds and strings. Every sub-group is an organized hierarchically structured group designed to give order for the good of the whole. All of these sub-groups are designed to work together for the good or the purpose of the whole with the conductor having ultimate responsibility to lead the way for the others. In a perfect spiritual world this would be how God’s family would have operated also. However, that is where God’s problem and solution begins to unfold and take place. Since God’s enemies are an integrated part of his organized orchestra, God has a major problem with some instruments being out of step with the ultimate plan of God who is the supreme conductor. If God’s organization was an orchestra, He could have fired Satan and his angels and replaced them with newly created ones and this would have been an acceptable solution. However, since we are speaking of a spiritual family structure we must realize that this complicates things very significantly.
Everything that I have said so far is a general review with some new enhanced details being presented to you to help you understand the concepts found within a family structure. These concepts here that I have given to you are actually very important to know. God is a highly structured and organized spiritual being. God does not create chaos. Everything that God has created had a designed purpose until individuals like Satan decided to create a new separate orchestra from God’s. Hopefully you understand the concept of design and purpose. For example, when you examine the human DNA, you cannot conclude this was accidental or came into being by chance. I learned as a computer programmer that every complex system that exists in the world dictates a designer who created it. The human DNA is so complex that it forces us to believe in a creator. Yet men still ignore it and think wrong. You see God has given us many clues within the things that He has created and His written word and we must learn from each.
So I have briefly covered family structure, organization, responsibility and individuality, but now I want to shift your focus to concentrate more on their commonalities. So let’s examine the subject of commonalities within the family members given. Since the daughter and the daughter-in-law are both the same woman we have one individual being called by two distinct titles or names. Every daughter is not a daughter-in-law, but every daughter-in-law is a daughter. These are interesting concepts that we will see in other parts of the Bible and this lesson. If you have ever studied the Bible you can easily understand that Satan is called by many different names, titles, descriptions and symbols. This is the concept of one individual being called by many identifiers and now I want to reverse that concept and teach you about one named individual consisting of many separately named personalities, entities or beings. It is a very similar concept of that given to us by the reality of the Trinity of God. There is one God who is referred or identified by 3 personalities, God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. Still one God, but viewed by a multi-tiered methodology. This concept is very prevalent in the world and in the Bible. Let’s examine the definition of “commonality”. According to the internet this word means “A shared feature or attribute between two or more individuals”. This is an interesting concept but it also goes beyond that definition. For example, a commonality can also be binding or non-binding. In other words a friendship between two people is a non-binding relationship, but a marriage between a husband and a wife is a type of binding relationship. Surely you understand what I am attempting to describe to you. It goes again to the old saying that you can choose your friends but you cannot choose your relatives. All of your relatives share a binding commonality that none of them can get out of. As long as you and your siblings are alive you will have that brother or sister in your family. Just because you move to another family or marry a husband or a wife to start a new family, you will still possess the designated titles of brothers and sisters with your old family members. This is a simple truth, but one that you need to apply to what is being described to you today about the spiritual family of God. Are you getting it?
Therefore, being in the family of God is the first unique qualifier of unified binding commonality. Every family member has the one family of God in common with the one spiritual head of the house, God the Father. Therefore, no family members came into the family from another family by marriage or from an external source of existence for instance. This is actually an important revelation to consider. When you think about God’s creation and the created spiritual beings like angels and humans, God is saying they were all an internal part of His personal family. They did not self-originate nor did they come into existence without the Father’s direct contribution to procreate. When God tells us in Micah 7:6 that a man’s enemies are those of His own house, He is revealing to us why He is doing what He is doing with having a son named Jesus. It also explains why it is so complicated for us to understand. If Satan was not in the family of God, God could have cast him into hell the moment any sin was found in Him. But, since Satan is a foundational and integral part of the organized family structure of God’s internal spiritual household, God cannot throw Satan into hell without moving Himself there at the same time. You will better understand that statement as I continue to describe to you who the women are in the family of God, so hang in there and let’s continue on.
The concept of multiple individuals being one is a foundational Bible truth scattered throughout the Bible and the world in various examples. Since God is describing 5 members in one family this is my next point to show you the patterned effect of this reality in our world. The United States is described to be One Nation under God and this reality involves millions of individual people who were either born there, moved there or lives there. Within the nation of the United States there exists a tiered structure of authority. We have a complex organized federal government followed by a system of State governments and finally the lower level county or city government structures. A baseball or a soccer team is one group that is comprised of several layers of individual players and coaches but they are often referred to in the term of being a single named entity, like the Chicago Cubs or the Portland Timbers. Each baseball team is organized with a head coach or team manager and then sub-divided levels of coaching responsibilities, like batting, fielding and pitching. Even the players can be organized into different leadership responsibilities like being given a team captain’s level of authority. The United States and a sports team are both representative entities of a highly organized group with structured levels of authority and responsibility. Does this occur in the Bible?
Think with me about the nation of Israel. They were described in the Bible to be one nation of people in covenant with God, but they were also sub-divided into 12 different tribes that came from the 12 sons of Jacob and this resulted in many, many individual people that were again one organized highly structured nation. This nation had a king who ruled like David. This nation had priests that ministered to God within the temple and these priests all came from the sons of Aaron which are a further sub-division within the structured nation. There was a chief priest and even a second priest mentioned in the Bible. So within the sub-division of priests there were was a ranking hierarchy. What I am attempting to do is to show you organized patterns that resemble God’s family structure. We can clearly see concepts where we must conclude that many individuals can be viewed as one named organized entity and that these people can be further divided or sub-divided and organized into many tiered levels of responsibility and authority. Being born in the nation of Israel was a binding commonality that you could not get out of. Once you were born a Jew you were always a Jew. This was either a good or a bad thing depending upon your point of view and your knowledge of the Bible, but I cannot go there today. Let’s review some other family commonalities that exist within the family of 5.
I guess I have taught this next concept in other Bible lessons, but for the sake of new readers I will repeat it for a clearer understanding of the subject of binding commonality. When God created the first man, in Genesis 1, He said that He made them male and female and that He called their name “Adam”. You can read that in the original Hebrew if you study it closely or you can also go and read it in Genesis 5:2. So God is basically revealing that two can be named as one. Then God shows us a more detailed creation account of the man and woman in Genesis 2. In this chapter the woman is taken from the side of the man and God presents the woman to the man where God continues to reveal the law of marriage to us in Genesis 2:24:
Gen 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
This verse represents God’s established law of marriage. This was not a new concept for God as we will soon learn, but this concept of marriage existed a long time before God created Adam. Within the text God says the two individuals are separate while simultaneously being joined to become one. Therefore we have the concurrent occurrence of unique separation while being joined and named as one united entity. This is exactly the concept that I have been attempting to teach you today about a binding commonality. However, this law introduces to us a completely new aspect to consider. According to God’s law, the man will leave his father and mother and be joined to his new wife and the two of them will become one new family. This is a new concept that has never happened before! Uh oh? This is also a major religious problem for how many people in the church think today. God gives us this law for the first time in reference to the creation of man and his wife. But, God never says that all of this is a new principle. We can understand that Adam is forced to separate from his mother and father and is required by law to be joined to his wife to create a new separate family. But, who were Adam’s mother and father? You see this is another one of those hidden riddle types of mysteries found in the Bible where God tells you something without telling you everything. What we see is the establishment of a new earthly family structure being organized apart from the existing family of God in heaven. God as the creator has to be the Father of Adam by definition (Heb 12:9). We can also understand this fact by the way that God breathed into the created man Adam, His own Spirit (Gen 2:7) after God had formed his body from the dust of the ground. The body of Adam had no life until God had breathed into him. We can also understand from this reality that this is a natural patterned foreshadowing of that which will reoccur in the spiritual realm when Jesus Christ came to the earth as the Son of God and the Last Adam (1 Cor 15:45). I’m sorry this is so complicated, but I did not write it. This is the Wisdom of the Most High God and it is so advanced while being concurrently simple that it makes me stand in amazement at the awesome plan of God.
From this information, we know that a husband and his wife are always two individuals that God says have been joined to become one. Therefore, we know from the given titles found in Micah 7:6 that a “daughter-in-law” title informs us of the existence of a marriage as well as a unified husband and wife relationship with binding commonality. I showed you in a previous lesson that the unmarried daughter must logically marry the unmarried son and they therefore are the only two that can legitimately become a new one by marriage. But, we also understand that the Father, the mother as well as the mother-in-law in this diagram are already all married and they are also “one” with each other. The titles, father, mother and mother-in-law all imply that they have been married. So that is 3 different layers of binding commonality that I just mentioned. First, the parents and the children are all one family. The first level of binding commonality is the Father’s family unit. The parents (father, mother and mother-in-law) are another unit of binding commonality by the law of marriage and finally the unmarried children become a new husband and wife unified family unit when they get married. We can see that there is one Father with two wives. We can know from the concepts given to us by the law of marriage that these three are one unit bound by the law. We can further know that the son and the daughter when they get married, they will become a new one family by the same law of marriage where God informs us that they must leave their current family in order to create this new family. This helps us to understand why Jesus revealed in Luke 12:52 that the 5 in one house will be divided 3 against 2 and 2 against 3. All of this helps us to understand the explanation to the riddle being presented. God is stating in a coded message that He has implemented a complex plan to cause a legal separation to occur while simultaneously a new union of binding everlasting commonality. I call this dividing and uniting at the same time. This is how God eliminates himself and us from evil while eternally joining Himself to those who are good. I know this is strange and I know this is not normal, but it is in the Bible, so God has a purpose in doing it this way and it is certainly possible even in the natural realm so you cannot disqualify it because it is different. While it is highly unique you must at least admit it is not inconceivable. Hopefully as we continue through the lesson series you will better understand why this is happening. I think I have gone way too long for this lesson. I have been reviewing some previous information today while teaching you some new very important information and we will use all of this knowledge to understand the identities of the women in the Family of God. I will hopefully get to this subject in the next lesson, God willing. Until next time God bless you!
If you would like to continue learning in this series you may go to “Part 6” now!
I was sent this prophetic word by God from an email from a church today and I feel like it would be a great thing to share with everyone. When the Spirit of God uses someone to bring a message to His people, I believe we should all pay attention to it. I would recommend that you read it carefully and try to recognize the voice of the Spirit of God that I heard within it. You are welcome to share it with anyone else that you like. If you ever hear a prophetic Word from God in your church service I would love to hear about it and you can send it to me and I will try to pass it along to everyone! To all those that have an ear to hear let them hear what the Spirit of God is saying to the church. God Bless!
In worship, I saw myself laying hands on my daughter and praying for her as she headed back to CFNI for the summer. I then heard this word in my spirit…
It’s time, it’s time to raise up this generation! Time to impart, time to lay hands on, time to stir up the gifts, time to clothe with armor and with the commission to go! To go into the world’s system as lights, as salt, as warriors – not afraid, not consumed with things, but with passion for the cross…to love God, hate sin and, in turn, love the focus of God’s heart, the apple of His eye…people!
No more pushing the kids away because we are too busy, but blessing by laying on hands and speaking the Word of the Lord into their hearts. Don’t miss the window of time. They are ready to be raised up and challenged. If not, the world will seduce them into its trap of greed, pride and pleasure, drawing them away from the call of God.
Say to this Joshua Generation, it’s time to go over and possess the Promised Land. Say to this David Generation, it’s time to defeat the giants in the land, worship God with abandonment and establish the throne for the soon-coming King of Kings. Say to this John the Baptist Generation, listen for the Word of the Lord, then rise up and prepare the way for the Lord.
This generation will see My glory and tremendous miracles. The nations will rise up and cry out for the Good News. Prepare the shield, prepare the sword, and prepare the hearts. They will have faces like lions and hearts like a lamb. Rise up O Blessed Generation. You are destined to usher in the King of Glory!
(ver 1.2) This is now Part 6 in a series of very advanced Bible lessons about the subject of deception. I have uncovered a lot of new information in this series and today’s lesson is some more information on the subject using the Bible to help answer and clarify a comment that I got recently. In today’s lesson I will focus on a very important question that was raised when someone told me that a Christian cannot be deceived because God will not permit them to be lost. That is a very common doctrine of theology in many churches, but is that what the Bible actually says? If you have not read this series from the beginning, I would suggest that you go and start reading from “Part 1” first. I will warn you up front that this will be a long lesson. I have a lot of things to cover today. But, if you read it all I believe you will learn much more than just the primary subject about deception. In one of my last Bible lessons I taught about Understanding Bible Prophets, what they are, why they exist and what they can and cannot do. In that lesson I paraphrased a verse that Jesus gave as a warning to us (the church). I thought it was a valid paraphrasing, but my commenter thought otherwise and told me why they thought this was wrong about what I said. I basically said a Christian could be deceived, so Jesus was warning us to be careful. I basically took the scripture personally and felt like this was God speaking to me. But, my commenter had a different point of view using a very different perspective of the Bible and tried to teach me how they understood the Bible. I want to say first that I believe my commenter was a Christian and that we are both climbing the same mountain to reach the peak of knowledge and understanding. However, our views of the scriptures were clearly from very different perspectives, like me being on the north side of the mountain and them being on the south side of the mountain. What I was looking at was not what they were looking at so this will at times cause many of the theological differences to occur within the Body of Christ. The only legitimate way to resolve these types of conflicts is for each party to change positions in order to try to gain the view from the other side of the mountain and then combine the two realities into the view from the top of the mountain. Maybe you do not understand mountain climbing. At the early altitude you are many times within the tree line and you have to rise beyond the trees to finally be able to see out. Then as you ascend your view becomes increasingly different until you reach the top and can see in 360 degrees of every side. In between the bottom and the top there are varying stages of revelation, the higher you go is based upon how much you know and have seen. I’m sorry I like mountains so I may have used this analogy before in another blog. When I was younger I liked camping in Colorado on the top of the mountains. The views were so awesome and the lessons of life are clearly learned from the things that God has created. I believe the world was created by design and that nothing occurs by chance or accident. We therefore, have to become smart enough to learn the lesson that God is trying to present to us with creation while simultaneously giving His written Word first priority in everything. Here were all of my commenter’s words that were shared with me.
In the initial paragraph of this week’s publication you state that, “Jesus also warned us that even the very elect could be deceived by their trickery, Matt 24:24.” KJ
Actual quotation from Matthew’s text: “For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.”
Readers need to know that this verse indicates, “IF POSSIBLE!” In other words, God does not allow this to happen to those who are truly saved nor does he even make it possible. However, he is using this language to cause the reader to understand the intensity of deceit that will be in the world during the last days.
Those who abide in Christ and have the Holy Spirit will not be taken captive by the world. The “perseverance of the saints,” is made possible through the indwelling Holy Spirit… “Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ.” Phil 1:6 KJ
We’ll I read their comment and I know why they said what they did, but the root of the problem is that there is more than one truth in the Bible and it appears to me that my commenter might have been closed to try to see the other scriptures found in the Bible from my view point. This is why we have so many Christian denominations in the world today. One church likes the view from their side of the mountain that they are climbing on and another church stays on the other side of the mountain loving their limited view of the same verse and we have isolationism occurring from our limited perspective view of the Bible. I have said this repeatedly and I will continue to teach it until we all get it, “there is more than one truth in the Bible and we as believers must see them all in order to view the complete actual truth”. No church should exalt one truth and claim that is ALL of the truth that is necessary for you to know. When people do this that is a very serious misrepresentation of God and the Bible and it oversimplifies them both. It is also a common ploy used for deception by Satan. The devil will tell someone one thing so that they ignore the other more important things and he then has them defeated and they do not even understand that they are in this condition. This was Satan’s approach with Eve when she was deceived in the garden. God said “Do not eat or you will surely die”. But, Satan never mentions that part of the subject. Satan says “You shall be as gods, knowing good and evil”. That was a new truth that replaced what God said in Eve’s mind. God never told Adam and Eve about what the consequences of death meant and Satan avoided the subject by telling them something else that sounded good on the surface. This was a tricky way to deceive someone, if you ask me. It is also the first time Satan deceived anyone in the Bible so it would be a very good future lesson to explore in this series.
You see I do not deny my commenters scripture references, I just have a problem with the fact that they have ignored the other parts of the Bible in order to interpret them in the way that they have. If we do not use the entire Bible to interpret the Bible we are doing nothing but promote the selective isolated doctrines of men and that is foolish. I tried to explain to my commenter that the law of gravity is a physical law of truth that states it is impossible for a man to fly. So the law of gravity was a valid truth that ruled men for thousands of years. Man believed this truth and lived by this law until finally they discovered another greater truth. When mankind learned of the law of aerodynamics and how that it supersedes the law of gravity this new truth allowed man to fly like a bird. So both laws are great truths, but one truth causes the other truth to become minor or insignificant when viewed and applied correctly. This is how the Bible is written. The Bible contains many truths, with some of them being dependent horizontal truths while other truths are independent vertical or hierarchical truths. Ok, I probably went over the head of many readers with that last statement, but this is an advanced Bible study so I will say things occasionally to get you thinking about old concepts in new more complex ways. Please just try to understand that one truth can supersede another truth. Let me give you a Bible example for what I am trying to say; the Bible says “The law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus has freed us from the law of sin and death” (Rom 8:2). This is exactly what I was attempting to say with the example of gravity and aerodynamics. The law of Life in Christ is a much higher law of truth that has nullified the law of sin and death just as the law of aerodynamics has nullified the laws of gravity. I hope you understand these truth concepts, they are very important to know. Let me start by giving you the actual verse that I paraphrased again and show you what Jesus says:
Mat 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
Ok here is the exact words written in the KJV ible and we need to actually see what it says. My first point is to notice the words “it were” are in italics and that reveals to us that these words were not written in the original Greek language and they have been added by the translators so we should technically ignore them. So the original verse says “If possible, they (the false Christs and false prophets) shall deceive the very elect”. I immediately wondered who my commenter thought the “very elect” were if they are not Christ’s church. Then I began to wonder what do the words “If possible” mean? According the Strong’s the Greek word translated as “If” is a particle of conditionality. In other words if this is true this occurs, if this is not true then something else occurs. This is a classic programming paradigm called If Then Else Logic and if you are not a programmer you probably do not have a clue what I just said. Nevertheless, the word “If” is always a conditional statement where something else either given or implied is a determining factor for whether what is stated can or cannot occur. Going back to my programming paradigm, when a compiler comes to an If statement a test is made in order to determine the next instruction to execute. When a test occurs, the next instruction that is executed is based upon resulting True or False condition of the test. Do you understand this? You do not have to be a computer programmer to understand this is how you behave every day. If you are hungry you get something to eat and if you are not hungry you don’t. The term “If” certainly does not mean it is NOT POSSIBLE for this to occur. You cannot get that from the definition of the word at any time. The term “possible” is a Greek word (G1415) that means “powerful” or “capable”. We know from the Bible that with God all things are possible. So we must determine what the word “If” coming before the word “possible” can mean. God uses three other Greek words in the New Testament for “impossible” and these are G101, G102 and G418. If God knows the difference between what is possible and what is not possible, I believe that He knows which word to use in what verse. I would suggest that you go and search the New Testament for G1415 (possible) and G102 (impossible). If you look up the definitions of these two words they are actually very revealing. Impossible is a word of “weakness” and possible is a word for “strength”. Which one is God? All things are possible with God meaning all things are strong with God. However, the Bible says “It is impossible for God to lie”. So God displays “weakness” when it comes to speaking lies. These are fascinating concepts that many Christians have not considered. Weakness is a positive when it comes to sin. But, strength in virtue and truth must be admirable. Because the word “If” occurs before the word “possible” God is saying this is possible but it has specific conditions which must be present to cause it to happen. This is a very simple way of saying you can be deceived under the right conditions. According to my commenter, they said it is not possible for a Christian to be deceived, because God would not allow or permit this to occur. I assume from their logic that they believe God controls the outcome of everything based upon the very popular Sovereign God theological doctrine found within many churches and they must feel that man has no further contribution to make to determine their eternal destiny. Go back and read my commenter’s words again.
Readers need to know that this verse indicates, “IF POSSIBLE!” In other words, God does not allow this to happen to those who are truly saved nor does he even make it possible. However, he is using this language to cause the reader to understand the intensity of deceit that will be in the world during the last days.
Hopefully you can see what they are trying to say? My commenter said “IF POSSIBLE” could be substituted for GOD does not allow this to occur”. Wow, is that what it really said? I am really not sure how anyone can arrive at that conclusion or interpretation of the verse, but obviously that is what they said. That is not what Strong’s said the words meant. Since Strong was a Greek and Hebrew expert I rely on his expertise more than my own or the opinions of people who leave me comments. In other words I’m not going to try to say what the verse says without some collaborating and supporting evidence from someone who is or was smarter than I am. If God tells me in another verse in the Bible that it is not possible for a man to be deceived, then that would be the best. If Strong, Thayer or Nave does not say that either then I just cannot override their expertise with my opinion of what I think it means. So whenever someone says “In other words” you better be careful that what is being stated is an actual equivalent phrasing for what was actually stated. The only way that I know of to how you can legitimately do that, is for you to look up all of the words in a dictionary or a thesaurus and then to see what they mean and if they are really valid synonyms. This is just basic Bible study guidelines and rules to follow. I’ll ask you again “What do the words If Possible mean”? Does it mean it is not possible? I do not think so. God tells us in other places in the Bible “It is impossible for Him to lie” (Heb 6:18). God obviously knows when something is possible and when something is not possible to occur and He knows when to use what word for either case. My commenter seemed to think that God wrote it this way to emphasize a point. But, I still think that this is trying to interpret the Bible in isolation without using the other verses found on the subject to help us to understand what is actually being communicated. For example, if you search the Bible you will find that these exact same Greek words translated as “If Possible” are used in other verses in the N.T. If you go and look at one of them they ought to show us if God uses the words in the same way in order to determine if God is being consistent with His words.
Rom 12:18 If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.
As you can hopefully see if you try to say “If possible” means that it is not possible, you must use that logic in this verse also in order to be consistent. So if you try to apply that logic to this verse in Romans, you would make it say “God does not permit you to live peaceably on the earth with all men. I do not think that this is what this verse is saying, do you? Do you understand this logic? Can you find anywhere in the Bible that it says “God does not permit” when used with the words “If Possible”. If it were not possible for a Christian to be deceived then why would God not tell us that anywhere? I think that would be a very good thing to know if that was actually true. Another point that I want to address is the implied statements being made by my commenter. My commenter implies that they are the “true Christians” and therefore they cannot ever be deceived. Since my commenter did not tell me otherwise I have to assume this is what they meant by examining what they have said. If this is what they believe, I feel very strongly that this is an extremely dangerous theology to base your faith. This would be a great theology if they were right, but if they are wrong then what guarantee do they have that they are not deceived already. Since Bible doctrine and theology is a moving target based upon your current knowledge, there is technically no one that can guarantee what they are preaching today is what they will preach tomorrow exactly. I do not know if you understand that statement or not? Truth is a complex subject and many people want to base their eternal destiny upon their limited knowledge of the Bible and God just might show you a new Bible verse tomorrow that completely changes your theology. Since neither you nor I are God we must be open to learning more at all times and this reality alone should cause us to change our theology as we all attempt to get to the summit of the Bible knowledge mountain. What we all need to do is to research the Bible to figure out the actual truth the best way that we can using all of the information that we can obtain on the subject. Study to show ourselves to be approved a workman that will not be put to shame because we rightly divide the Word of Truth (2 Tim 2:15). So that is what I will try to do again today. You see, I am smart enough to know that I do not know everything. I also think that God is still revealing new things every day. So these two beliefs lead me to be open to change.
Bible study is a rules based system of learning. In other words if you do not know the rules you cannot follow them and therefore there is no way that you will figure out what the truth is. I will not try to give you all of the rules for Bible interpretation today; I have tried to do this in many other Bible lessons so go and read them to learn the correct way to interpret the Bible. I will give you a secret that I use to study the Bible constantly and this may help you if you apply it. When you study a subject search the Bible for the words that you are interested in and find all of the Bible verses that contain those words and then go read what they say. If God uses the same Greek or Hebrew word in every verse then you can be assured you are learning about the exact same subject. Therefore what God says in each verse applies to what is said in every other verse with that same word. This is just a very basic Bible study methodology. You see I know for sure my commenter did not do this or they would have seen what I am going to show you today about the subject of deception. Another Bible study basic is for you to look up the words that you are reading in a Greek or Hebrew dictionary to see what they mean in the original languages. Many times English words have changed and the meanings are no longer the same. For example, in the King James Bible many times the Greek word “agape” is translated as “charity” and this is a total inaccuracy using modern day concepts of the English word for charity. Agape is the Greek word that describes “the God Kind of Love” and that is an important difference between the English word and the Greek word. In fact in the Bible there is more than one Greek word translated as love, how are you going to know the difference if you do not go and search for it? Let me give you the Greek Word definition for “deceive” as it is translated in Matthew 24:24. I think I have given you this definition before in previous lessons, but this is so important that I feel it needs to be restated:
From G4106; to (properly cause to) roam (from safety, truth, or virtue): – go astray, deceive, err, seduce, wander, be out of the way.
You should see by the definition of this Greek word translated as deceive alone that it causes major problems for my commenter’s theology. To roam or to go astray is a clear description of someone who once was on the path of safety, virtue and truth and they have now wandered from it to become lost. Uh oh? It is very clear to me that the Greek word definition shows someone who once knew the truth, but wandered away from it. Are you a Christian today? If you are then it is because someone presented you the truth and you decided to believe it. Can you knowing the truth now choose to walk away from it? According to the definition of this word it is more than possible. The definition of this word “deceive” says people were in the town of Truth and they wandered off and got lost and now cannot find their way back. What are we going to do with that information? Can you see and understand how to apply this? Do you remember when Jesus said “I am the Good Shepherd? Do you know that we are His sheep? Do you know that His sheep can wander off and decide not to follow the shepherd? According to my commenter’s theology this is not possible, because every one of God’s sheep must have a tight choker collar around their necks with a leash that is tied around the shepherd’s staff, so they cannot stray and get lost. The only way to keep a sheep from straying is to tie them and no shepherd that is good will do this to their animals. Please go search the web and see how shepherds lead their sheep. If you want to learn more on this subject you can read my lesson on “Understanding Sheep in the Bible”. Jesus told a story of a sheep getting lost and Him having to go out and find it (Mat 18:12). Jesus is using a story with natural symbolism to convey a spiritual truth about God and us His people. If you look up the words in this verse you will see “go astray” is the same word translated as “deceive” in Mat 24:24. Uh oh? Therefore, we are talking about the exact same subject, yes in both verses? In this story Jesus says He will leave the 99 to try to find the 1 who was deceived to stray. Who is guarding the 99 while He is out looking for the one that was deceived? Can a wolf come and kill one of the 99 sheep while Jesus is looking for the one? Could the wolf already have killed the one sheep that left the safety of the shepherd? Why did God allow one sheep to leave and become deceived? Oh, yea God is sovereign, omnipotent, omniscient and is omnipresent. If that was all of the truth then why did God use such human examples to describe Himself when He possessed such gret deity qualities? If God is permitted to use all of His supernatural powers then it would be impossible for any of His sheep to get lost in the first place. Since He clearly tells us that a sheep left the flock and must be searched for this tells us God is not in control of what that sheep did. That sheep was deceived to leave the safety of the flock and the shepherd and that is not good for them. I believe that God chooses not to use His supernatural powers by His own choice. If you can find me scriptures to contradict this belief, I will be happy to change. But, I believe that this is the only viable explanation of how a human example of a shepherd losing a sheep could apply to God. If God does not give His sheep the freewill choice to leave, that would make God a controlling manipulator. If you are a married person, is that the kind of spouse that you desire to be married to? I do not think so! Otherwise I have no explanation of why Jesus used this example to describe Himself and us His sheep. Just notice the story of the sheep and see that Jesus says there are 100 sheep and one is deceived and has been lost because they wandered off by their own choice or will. This is what Jesus is teaching to us; His sheep have the right to leave and they can be deceived. Do you understand this?
Let’s back up in the chapter of Matthew and read some other words that Jesus spoke before this statement in Mat 24:24 in order to examine the context of the statement. If you go back to the first part of the chapter you will see Jesus describing things that will occur in the last days. Since we are living in the last days I believe that means whatever Jesus is about to say applies to us. The disciples then come to Jesus privately in Matthew 24:3 and ask Him, when will these things occur? Who is Jesus speaking to in this chapter? My commenter thinks that Jesus is only speaking to the readers, whoever they are. I do not know about you, but I am reader? I wonder if my commenter is also a reader. I guess they think they are not? Since I know of hardly any unsaved people who read the Bible, I’m not really sure who they are thinking Jesus is speaking to. God says in Matthew 24:3 that He was speaking to the disciples and they were the founding fathers of the church. But, my commenter has determined Jesus was speaking to someone else. However, here is the beginning of Jesus’ answer to the “disciples” question:
Mat 24:4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
Wow, this is obviously a hard saying if Jesus the Son of God is speaking in private to only His own disciples. Jesus clearly says “Beware” and “do not let anyone deceive you”. Does Jesus ever say “It is impossible for them to be deceived”? Is Jesus speaking to the founding fathers of the church? Obviously Jesus does not even come close to saying they cannot be deceived. If Jesus warns His personal disciples, His inner circle of 12 students not to be deceived, it is very obvious to me that they could easily become deceived at any time going forward from that warning. What is a warning? A warning is like when you tell your children do not touch the stove because it is hot. When you said that did you mean it was not possible for them to touch it? Obviously that was not why you warned them not to touch it. This is really not that hard and it only takes a little common sense to see that Jesus would never warn His disciples of something that was not possible to occur.
This revelation alone disqualifies the “Predestination” theology. This knowledge alone invalidates the “Once Saved Always Saved” theology. Here Jesus is speaking to many of the future writers of the New Testament and He says you better be careful or you will be deceived. I will tell you this directly, if it was possible for the disciples to be deceived, then any regular Christian today is in dire straits if they think they cannot ever be deceived. These are very strong words and very important words for you to understand. I also want to point out that this Greek word translated as “deceive” is the exact same word found in Matthew 24:24 so Jesus is definitely giving you relevant information that you need to know about the subject of deception in the last days.
Let’s explore the same information found in Matthew, but this time read it in Mark. Many times one writer will phrase the text in one way differently than the other or they will give you the same information with different words. Plus I like to find two or three witnesses in the Bible to everything that I teach in order to help establish the truth. So let’s turn to Mark 13 and read what Jesus says there:
Mar 13:5 And Jesus answering them began to say, Take heed lest any man deceive you:
Mar13:6 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
If you continue to read down in this chapter you will again see that Jesus is speaking of the last days. Since I believe strongly that we are living in the last days, I believe that if you do not take this warning personally as a True Christian that you can be deceived very easily. Every word of God is written to you personally and this verse does not say “If Possible”. It says “Take heed” and that is something that you are required to do, not God! Too many Christians want to put the responsibility all on God. God will not permit me to be tested. God will not permit me to be tempted. God will not permit me to be deceived and that is just not what the Bible says anywhere. Jesus would not have given us a warning if it were not possible for us (the church) to be deceived. If you ignore these Bible verses and think they do not apply to you, I’ll say it again you are in trouble. Think with me for a second and determine who was present to hear these words of Jesus. Weren’t Judas and the other 11 disciples always present when Jesus spoke? What did Judas do? You probably know that Judas betrayed Jesus and turned Him over to be killed for silver. Was Judas deceived? Absolutely, Judas was deceived. He heard the exact same words of truth that Peter heard and every other disciple heard and he still decided not to believe in them and do his own thing. You can clearly read in the Bible that Satan entered into Judas and this caused him to betray Jesus. It is very clear to me that Satan was present to cause any disciple to fall into deception that would permit him to do so. Only Judas because of his greed for money was motivated to ignore his eternal outcome for a monetary short term gain which he soon regretted. However, if one disciple of the twelve can be deceived every disciple can be deceived. If any disciple can be deceived then you can be deceived.
Think with me for another moment about what Jesus said in Matthew 24:24 knowing the context of the verse are about the end time events. Jesus said beware of the “false Christ”. This is a direct reference to the coming anti-Christ which is probably in the world today somewhere. We know there have been foolish men who have claimed to be the Christ and they have caused many to die and be lost. But, if the anti-Christ is a false Christ and Jesus is speaking a warning to the church, what is going to happen when he shows up doing great signs and wonders that only a supernatural being can do. I believe that many Christian will buy into his false message based upon his overwhelming knowledge of how to deceive people. This is why Jesus said in Matthew 24:24 that it is possible for even the elect to be deceived, they should be careful not to allow this to happen.
My commenter said that a “True Christian” cannot be deceived and by this they imply there are false Christians in the world. They further imply they are one of the “True Christians” that are incapable of being deceived. This is of course a very convenient theology to believe in with great personal benefits. It is no wonder that so many Christians have bought into this philosophy. Now whenever, anyone comes up as having been deceived, they can simply say they were never a “True Christian” in the first place. Of course this is not true using the definition of the word “deceive” that we found. Jesus warned us of the coming “False Christs” and the “False Prophets” who will deceive many. By definition a false prophet is a man who says he is a prophet but who is not. It is the same with a false Christ. Finally, a false Christian is one that says they are a Christian and they are not. I do believe that all of these exist in the world today right now. Both the true and the false must coexist in the world simultaneously by simple logic and reasoning.. However, I am not addressing false Christianity because they are already deceived. You do not ever warn someone about something they have already fallen into, right? You can only try to help them out of their pit of deception if they are interested in getting your help. If not, they will remain in the their deception and be content. So by simple logic found in Matthew 24:24 we can determine that Jesus cannot be speaking to anyone, but a Christian who is walking in the Light of Truth. This would be someone who knows the truth, but chooses to walked away from it to do the wrong things.
Let me talk to you about some modern day preachers that have been deceived. I know of several and I could name their names and you would know who I am talking about, but I will not do that. You will probably know who I’m talking about anyway because they were in the news. Anyway one preacher had a national TV ministry and a major Bible school and obviously was doing great things for God when one day he was discovered with a prostitute. This was not good news for his church or his wife and family. Was he just a false Christian or was he a Christian who was deceived? Remember the definition of the word “deceive” from Strong? I recall that “deceive” seems to be defined as someone who was safe in the truth, but who has now wandered off from it. Was this famous preacher a false Christian or just one that knew the truth and decided to do the wrong things anyway? Do you see how complicated this subject really is? I believe that you cannot say this preacher was not a Christian to begin with or that he was a false Christian based upon the fruits that he had exhibited. Jesus said you will know them by their fruits. But, even a preacher, saved and filled with Spirit of God can be deceived to do the wrong things. Plus the fact that this preacher asked for forgiveness and the Bible says that when you do this God will forgive you (1 Jo 1:9). Let me say that deception comes in varying degrees. I believe that any Christian can be deceived to sin, but not be lost completely if they turn and see their mistake and repent. If my commenter thinks they are a perfect Christian that never sins, they are definitely deceived. If they think that it is impossible for them to sin, again there is deception that has already occurred and they better wake up soon. Let me say again that any Christian is capable of sinning and knowing this fact alone we should realize that Satan is out to try to trick us into going back to what our flesh use to want to do all the time; whether it was drugs, sex, cigarettes, alcohol, food or whatever.
Another preacher that will remain nameless had a 5000 member church in the Bible belt of America. His TV ministry was seen nationwide. I went to his church and I saw all of this first hand, so this is not hearsay or speculation. I saw the church and the ministries grow, I saw the salvation of many people while I was in the church. People would get saved in almost every service. I felt the power of God present and things were happening supernaturally so God was present. I sat under the anointing of God and felt the power of God present so I know he was a Christian. I could hear the sermons and read the Bible verses that were being taught and they were sound doctrine. However, over time I saw a change occurring in the senior pastor and the church. He eventually left his wife and married another woman and began to preach some really strange things. There were many personal and church related problems and issues and this senior pastor soon left his new wife and married another woman. The church went from over 5000 members to it is non-existent today. That church went from awesome to nothing in a very short time all because of one man being deceived by Satan. There was clearly a level of deception that had taken place to take this senior pastor from a great man of God to his downfall. All of these examples are warnings for Christians today. I could give you many more examples, but that is just pointless. Just understand that if it can happen to a major church pastor, it can happen to you. If it can happen to a disciple of Jesus it can happen to you.
Let’s go through some Bible verses in the New Testament and see if God says if a Christian can become deceived or not? You are going to have to read your Bible and study it, but they are not complicated if you can open your spiritual eyes and see what God is saying. I will only focus on scriptures written to the church. The Church is the target readers of the Epistles. All of these letters were written to True Christians for instruction and for correction and that is what I hope they do for you today.
1Co 15:33 Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.
1Co 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
Gal 6:7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
These are three direct witnesses that convey the message that Christians can be deceived. You do not write to anyone in the Church and tell them not to fall into deception if it is impossible for them to do this. That would be stupid for God to do. Do you understand that? Are these the Words of God written to you and I? I believe they are. I’m sure there are some people who can explain away what the Bible says, but I choose to take the words of the Bible to be truth. I want you to see that three times God writes to the church and tells them it is their responsibility not to fall into deception. If God could stop it from happening, He would not warn you that it could happen. If you look up the Greek word translated as “deceived”, you will see that it is the same one used by God in Matthew 24:24. Therefore, these verses apply to the subject given and it clearly tells us based upon context that a Christian can be deceived. Let’s go though some more scriptures that say this also using some different phrasing.
Eph 5:6 Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.
2Th 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
1Jn 3:7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.
Here are three more direct witnesses from the scripture that clearly say “Let no man deceive you”. Notice that none of them said “God will let no man deceive you”. These words are clearly written to the church and the Apostle John even calls us the “children” of God. It is self-evident that even real Christians can be deceived by an active or inactive participation of their own freewill. If you let someone deceive you, you can make the right choices to keep from being deceived. This is a clear assignment of self-responsibility. If God says “Let no man” there is an alternative outcome to being deceived and it comes back to a conditional statement of dependency upon what you do or permit to be done. Therefore, it is an act of your will or the omission of action by your will that causes you to be deceived. Wow, that is an important statement to learn. Let me give you a funny example. When my wife was young her mom would make her a sandwich and she would need a drink or something and have to get up from the table to get it and when she came back someone had taken a bite out of her sandwich. Well this was a cruel joke by her dad, but she got the point very fast. She never left her food again on the table if she got up to get something. It is like the old saying fool me once shame on you, but fool me twice shame on me. I guess what we need to do as Christians is to learn what we need to do to keep the devil from taking a bite of our sandwich and then keep him from doing it ever again.
Deception is a very important subject and that is why I teach on it so much. It is critical for you to know as much as possible on this subject so that you understand how deception can come so that you will be able to avoid it. Deception will come to you in many forms, in many ways and for many purposes. But, one of the ways is through men who wear sheep’s clothing, but are the hidden wolves underneath (Mat 7:15). God would not warn Christians Not to be deceived, if it were not possible. This is just basic reasoning and logic using simple Bible study techniques to help discover the truth. What we as Christians must realize is that we are in a spiritual warfare for the eventual outcome of our eternal spirits. Satan is highly motivated to deceive even “God’s elect ones”. Satan has the knowledge, power and experience to do it and he does not need God’s permission in order to try to do it and this is what you need to know today.
I’ll end this lesson today with another set of witnesses found in the Bible, but these are a little bit different in what they say and how they say it. But you will still notice that they are definitely written to the Church and spoken by Jesus to us. These verses have some very profound words within them and they definitely apply to the subject of deception, even if the word does not appear in these verses. You see there are more rules to Bible interpretation than what I can tell you about in this one lesson. You will just have to read what Jesus is saying and then figure out how it applies to God, to you, the church, Satan and the subject of deception.
Rev 2:7 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.
Rev 2:11 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death.
Rev 2:26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
Rev 3:5 He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.
Rev 3:12 Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.
Rev 3:21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.:
Why does Jesus speak these 6 times about “those that overcome”? Do you understand that these are all promises or rewards from God of something for something? In other words every one of these promises are conditional. It is totally depends upon the fact that if you qualify for the promises then and only then will you be rewarded with the promises. Do you understand that all of these are the words written to the Church? Are not these people the True Christians who have been given these messages? Maybe you think that you are not in the same church as these people that Jesus is speaking to, and if that is the case you are in trouble. I believe Jesus is making a very serious point by repeating this phraseology this many times. Jesus is clearly saying that you have a Major Responsibility to become an overcomer. What does it mean to be an overcomer? Wow, I guess that is something not too many Christians understand unless they were in the military or played a competitive sport or had cancer and finally got a clean bill of health from their doctor. You see an overcomer is only someone who is victorious. Clearly an overcomer is a winner of a battle or conflict. These statements have vast implications written on them. It means you can be a failure by default. It means that you can be a quitter by choice. It means you can be defeated by your enemy. It means you can stray from the narrow path and follow the crowd down the wide path to destruction. These verses tell me that a Christian can be deceived and not be victorious. It is your choice, your will, your decisions and your actions that will either cause you to win or to be defeated. If you follow God and the truth of His word this will never happen, but if someone comes to you with a great false message and you follow that, you have left the truth and been deceived and God will let you go. It means you are in trouble if you believe that God is not going to allow you to be deceived. I do not see anywhere in these verses in Revelation where God guarantees you victory if you quit or don’t fight or don’t want to win, what do you think God is going to do about that? Do you believe that God is going to override your desire to do your own thing to force you to His things? If you think this you are clearly mistaken. God is not going to make you do the right things. God will not force feed you so that you grow in the truth. All God can do is send someone like me to try to steer you back into the right path and if you refuse to listen I’m sorry but there is nothing else He will do for you.
God expects you to do something and you need to learn what that is. One of the first major prophecies in the Bible is one found in Genesis 3:15 where God says “The seed of the woman shall bruise the head of the serpent”. I know I paraphrased again. But, that was the verse in a nutshell. We all know the serpent is Satan, but few understand who the Seed of the Woman is referring to. If you want to learn who this is you can read my other Bible lessons to find out for sure. But, I will tell that this woman is the church and she is the one that God expects to be victorious. To be under someone’s foot is a symbolic sign that they are defeated by that person whose foot is on them. You can see this many places in the Bible and one place is in Joshua where God told the nation of Israel everywhere the sole of your feet tread I have given to you. Well Israel is a natural typology of the church in this example. Just as Joshua fought to take the promise land, we are forced to fight a spiritual battle to possess God’s promises. What did we read in Revelations 6 times? We read conditional promises? Was the Promised Land conditional for Israel in the O.T.? What if they had not fought the giants, they would have died in the wilderness like everyone else and missed out on the promise. Hopefully you can understand my point.
You see in Romans 16:20, God writes to the church and says “The God of Peace shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly”. According to this verse in Romans, we are the Seed of the Woman that was prophesied about in Genesis 3:15. It is the feet of the church that God is going to use to bruise the head of Satan. If this is true, then we as a church have a role of responsibility to participate in its fulfillment. I know there are many Christians who believe God controls everything that happens in the world. These Christians have been deceived already into believing they have no role to play, no responsibility for anything and no accountability if it is not done. It is what I preach to be a “No fault” Christian religion. No matter what happens, it was not my fault. I never planted the seeds that caused that to happen! I never stopped it from happening, but that was not my job! I wonder how these types of Christians get up in the morning and do anything all day long. If everything is completely up to God, it would seem to me that we should not try to do anything all day. It would be best, if we all become vegetables and stayed in bed until God bruises Satan’s head and then comes and takes us all away. You see while Christians believe this C.R.A.P. (Christian Reasoning Applied Poorly) they fail to know that God is waiting on them to become strong enough to fulfill what He has planned. Is God waiting for the church? Is that possible? When God describes to us that He has long patience as He does in James 5:7 that is a clear revelation that God is not controlling everything that happens and He is waiting patiently for something to occur in order for the end to happen. If you do not understand what that is, you better learn it quickly because the end is coming soon ready or not. I plan on me being one of the ones that is ready for the end so if you care to join me let’s work together to fulfill the prophecy of Genesis 3:15. It is only when the church is victorious over Satan that Jesus can look at us as being the overcomers as He clearly stated 6 times that He was looking for in the book of Revelation.
If you have read this entire lesson and still want to believe you can never be deceived, I’m not sure if I can say anything else to prove to your otherwise. Deception is a very large and complex subject found in the Bible. Because you do not understand it, you easily misapply the verses to say that it is impossible for you to be deceived. However, God is never going to force you to see the truth. God will let you go to your grave believing in you erroneous theology. But, you will have to tear those pages out of the Bible of all of the Bible verses that I have given to you today in order to still go to church and believe wrong about deception. There were at least 14 Bible verse witnesses to the fact that church members can be deceived. Since the Bible says in the mouth of two or three witnesses let every word be established, I have given you overwhelming evidence to the truth. If you deny it your blood is not on my hands. If you have 3 Bible verses that say a Christian can NEVER be deceived, I would love to hear about them. I have gone on long enough today, so please come back next time and I’ll try to speak about a different subject that may be more popular with everyone and less controversial. Just understand my motivation for doing what I do. If I did not care, I would not try to help you. If I did not love you I would not bring you an alternative viewpoint. Do not think that I am here to criticize you; I am only here to try to help. I know I’m not perfect and I know can say things that offend people, but I do not do it to deceive you or cause you harm. If you could see my heart I think you would understand why I address the subject of deception with such a passion. God Bless!
If you want to know how to get saved and know that you are with confidence you can go to: How do I get saved?